Our results of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: evaluation of 700 patients
Mustafa Özsoy, Bahadır Celep, Ogun Ersen, Taner Özkececi, Ahmet Bal, Sezgin yılmaz, Yüksel Arıkan
Department of General Surgery, Afyon Kocatepe University Faculty of Medicine, Afyon, Turkey
Abstract
Objective: Although radiological imaging modalities like barium enema and computed tomography provide some clues, endoscopic methods still maintain superiority in assessment and differential diagnosis of large intestinal symptoms and complaints that require biopsy. We aimed to present the results of colonoscopic procedures performed in our general surgery clinic in detail.
Material and Methods: Seven hundred patients who presented to Afyon Kocatepe University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of General Surgery Endoscopy Unit between January 2011 and July 2012 with an indication for colonoscopy were retrospectively evaluated.
Results: Out of the 700 patients enrolled in the study 356 (50.8%) were male while 344 patients (49.2%) were female. The mean age of the patients was found to be 49 years. Within the group of 700 patients who underwent colonoscopic examinations, the terminal ileum and cecum had been reached on the first attempt in 432 patients (61.7%) and colonoscopic success has been achieved. Results of colonoscopies performed on 700 patients in our clinic revealed malignancy in 42 (6%) patients, and all of these patients were treated surgically in our clinic. Mortality was not observed in this series. Procedure-related bleeding and perforation developed in 6 patients. One patient developed respiratory arrest due to sedation that was responsive to resuscitation. The complication rate in our series was 1%.
Conclusion: In the study where we revised our own clinical experience, we found that our success rate was lower than the literature, and our complication rate was higher. The main reasons are accepted as our colonoscopy unit’s being young and the low patient volume.
Keywords: Colonoscopy, surgeon, diagnosis
Ethics committee approval was not required, since the study was a retrospective study.
Written informed consent was obtained from patients who participated in this study.
Externally peer-reviewed.
Concept - Y.A.; Design - M.Ö.; Supervision - B.C.; Funding - O.E.; Data Collection and/or Processing - O.E.; Literature Review - S.Y.; Writer - M.Ö.; Critical Review - T.Ö., A.B.
No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.