Wafi Attaallah1, Göksel Menek1, Fatma Aleyna Erdaş1, İbrahim Yusuf İnceoğlu1, Makbule Pervin Kankılıç1, Ahmet Hakan Yılmazer1, Berrak Yeğen2

1Department of General Surgery, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
2Department of Physiology, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey


Objective: For decades, rectal prolapse has been hypothesized to be caused due to laxity or weakness of the pelvic floor muscles which is often sup- posed to be related to childbearing in females. However, 50% of females with rectal prolapse have been reported to be nulliparous and this hypothesis does not explain the incidence of rectal prolapse in males. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of rectal redundancy in rectal prolapse patho- physiology.

Material and Methods: Nineteen female Sprague Dawley rats (250-300 g) at 16 weeks of age were obtained from the animal center. Rats were divided into two groups as rectal mobilization (study) group (n= 9) and sham-operated control (n= 10) group. In the study group, soft dissection was applied and rectum were mobilized up from the pelvic floor to create a redundant or hypermobilized rectum.The primary outcome was the rate of rectal pro- lapse after rectal mobilization.

Results: As compared to the sham-operated control group, in which none of the rats had rectal prolapse throughout the post-surgical period, rectal prolapse was observed in four of the rats in the rectal mobilization group (0% vs. 44%; p= 0.006). Being unable to increase the length of the rectums of the rats, but using only mobilization to create the redundancy, and the lack of data regarding any adhesions after surgery are the main limitations of this study.

Conclusion: This study showed the role of rectal redundancy on the rectal prolapse pathophysiology.

Keywords: Rectal prolapse, pathophysiology, redundancy


Ethics Committee Approval

The approval for this study was obtained from Marmara University Animal Experiments Local Ethical Committee (Decision No: 08.2019.mar, Date: 08.02.2019).

Peer Review

Externally peer-reviewed.

Author Contributions

Concept - A.A., G.S.S., V.K.; Design - A.A., S.S., V.K.; Supervision - A.A., G.S.S., V.K.; Materials - D.J.A., O.H.S., V.B.; Data Collection and/or Processing - D.J.A., O.H.S.; Analysis and/or Interpratation - D.J.A., O.H.S., V.B.; Literature Review - D.J.A., S.S., V.B.; Writing Manuscript - A.A., G.S.S., V.K.; Critical Reviews - A.A., G.S.S., S.S., V.K.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Financial Disclosure

The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.