Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the treatments of patients with acute biliary pancreatitis after cholecystectomy.
Materials and Methods: Twenty-two patients who were diagnosed with acute biliary pancreatitis and underwent cholecystectomy were analysed retrospectively. The patients' demographic characteristics, severity of disease, elapsed time since cholecystectomy, whether endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy were performed, surgical intervention, duration of hospital stay, and mortality were recorded.
Results: The average age of the 22 patients was 60.14±16.4 (21- 86), and the female to male ratio was 14:8. The average elapsed time since cholecystectomy was 81.7 (6-240) months. In 18 patients, stones and mud were detected in the choledoch duct with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, with no factors identified in 4 patients. While 14 of these 18 patients were treated successfully with stone extraction and endoscopic sphincterotomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography did not succeed in 4 patients. In 3 of 4 patients, in whom stones were detected but failed to be extracted, choledoch duct exploration was carried out with open surgery. Mortality developed in one patient. Average hospital stay, with the exception of the deceased patient, was 8.5±3.5 days.
Conclusion: Some choledoch duct stones can remain asymptomatic for an extended period after cholecystectomy. However, some cause acute pancreatitis ending in mortality after several months or even years. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy are the standard methods of treatment. Patients in whom endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sphincterotomy have failed, can be treated with choledoch duct exploration with open surgery and laparoscopic surgery.
Keywords:
Acute biliary pancreatitis, cholecystectomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic sphincterotomy
References
1Bradley EL 3rd. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 1993; 128: 586-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/ archsurg.1993.01420170122019 [CrossRef]
2Gloor B, Stahel PF, Müller CA, et al. Incidence and management of biliary pancreatitis in cholecystectomized patients. Results of a 7-year study. J Gastrointest Surg 2003; 7: 372-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1091- 255X(02)00418-3 [CrossRef]
3Aran Ö. Kılıç AY. Safra yolları hastalıkları. Sayek İ. Temel cerrahi.3. Baskı. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi: 2004: 1385.
4Anwar S, Rahim R, Agwunobi A, et al. The role of ERCP in management of retained bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. N Z Med J 2004; 117: 1102.
5Chari RS, Shah SA. Biliary system. In: Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL. Sabiston Textbook of Surgery. 19 th ed. St. Louis, Mo: WB Saunders; 2012: 1411-1475.
6Toouli J, Brooke-Smith M, Bassi C, et al. Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 17: 15-39. http://dx.doi. org/10.1046/j.1440-1746.17.s1.2.x [CrossRef]
7Yanar F, Alış H. Akut pankreatitlerin prognozunun belirlenmesinde skorlama sistemlerinin rolü. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gen Surg-Special Topics 2011; 4: 43-47.
8Rogers AL, Farha GJ, Beamer RL, et al. Incidence and associated mortality of retained common bile duct stones. Am J Surg 1985; 150: 690-693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002- 9610(85)90410-6 [CrossRef]
9Braghetto I, Debandi A, Korn O, et al. Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic cholecystectomy without routine intraoperative cholangiography. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998; 8: 349-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00019509- 199810000-00005[CrossRef]
10Gümüş M, Uçmak F, Önder A, ve ark. Akut pankreatit deneyimimiz: 401 vakanın analizi. Türk HPB 2009; 5: 61-64.
11Chiappetta Porras LT, Nápoli ED, Canullán CM, et al. Laparoscopic bile duct reexploration for retained duct stones. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12: 1518-1520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/ s11605-008-0596-6[CrossRef]
12Leese T, Neoptolemos J, Carr-Locke D. Successes, failures, early complications and their management following endoscopic sphincterotomy: results in 394 consecutive patients from a single center. Br J Surg 1985; 72: 215-219. http://dx.doi. org/10.1002/bjs.1800720325[CrossRef]
13Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, et al. Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 2008; 57: 1004-1021. http://dx.doi. org/10.1136/gut.2007.121657[CrossRef]
14Mackenzie ME, Davies WT, Farnell MB, et al. Risk of recurrent biliary tract disease after cholecystectomy in patients with duodenal diverticula. Arch Surg 1996; 131: 1083-1085. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/arc hsurg.1996.01430220077017[CrossRef]
15Grönroos JM, Haapamäki MM, Gullichsen R. Effect of the diameter of the common bile duct on the incidence of bile duct stones in patients with recurrent attacks of right epigastric pain after cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg 2001; 167: 767-769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/110 24150152707752[CrossRef]