Comparison between Karydakis flap repair and Limberg flap for surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus (short term results)
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
VOLUME: 26 ISSUE: 3
P: 153 - 156
September 2010

Comparison between Karydakis flap repair and Limberg flap for surgical treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus (short term results)

Turk J Surg 2010;26(3):153-156
1. Kayseri Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Genel Cerrahi, Kayseri, Türkiye
2. Elazığ Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Genel Cerrahi, Elazığ, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Purpose: Pilonidal sinus is an intergluteal region disease with acute or chronic pain and is especially more common in young men. There are many medical modalities and surgical techniques in the treatment of this disease. At this study we aimed to present two different types of surgical methods and their follow-up results in patients with pilonidal sinus. Patients and Methods: Patients with pilonidal sinus disease were treated by excision plus primary closure (Group 1, n=68) or rhomboid excision plus Limberg flap advancement (Group 2, n=74). Data were collected retrospectively and demographic data, operation time, hospital stay duration, time-off from work, follow-up time, number of patients with recurrence and time to recurrence were evaluated in all patients. Results: No significant difference was detected between group 1 and 2 in terms of gender and duration of operation time (p=0.651). Hospital stay duration (1.44 [1–3] days, p<0.001) and time off from work (12 [8–14] days, p<0.001) were found to be shorter in rhomboid excision with Limberg flap advancement (Group 2). Serous fluid collection and discharge were seen at the site of the lesion in four patients (5.81%) in group 1 (n=68), and in four patients (5.4%) in group 2 (n=74). Subcutaneous hematoma was detected in one patient (1.35 %) in group 2. During the follow-up period, none of the patients developed wound infection. Recurrence was seen in one patient (1.5%) in group 1. Conclusion: Limberg flap closure method is better and more effective than Karydakis flap in pilonidal sinus disease, because of wound infection control at early stage and less recurrence rate at later stage and early return to daily life.

Keywords:
Pilonidal sinus, Karydakis flap, Limberg technique

References

1
Sondenaa K, Andersen E, Nesvik I, Soreide JA. Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 1995;10:39-42.
2
Urhan MK, Kücükel F, Topgul K et al. Rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for managing pilonidal sinus: results of 102 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:656-659.
3
Bozkurt MK, Tezel E. Management of pilonidal sinus with the Limberg flap. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41:775-777.
4
Spivak H, Brooks VL, Nussbaum M, Friedman I. Treatment of chronic pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1136-1139.
5
Füzün M, Bakır H, Soylu M et al. Which technique for treatment of pilonidal sinus- open or closed? Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1148-1150.
6
Alemdaroğlu K, Akçal T, Buğra D. Pilonidal Hastalık. Kolon Rektum ve Anal Bölge Hastalıkları. 1.baskı, İstanbul. 2003:185-
7
Çubukçu A, Çubukçu D. Pilonidal sinüs hastalığı. Çağdaş Cerrahi Dergisi 2002;16:234-238.
8
Armstrong JH, Barcia PJ. Pilonidal sinus disease. The conservative approach. Arch Surg 1994;129:914-917.
9
Kooistra HP. Pilonidal sinuses. Review of the literature and report of three hundred and fifty cases. Am J Surg 1942;55:3-17.
10
Hull TL, Wu J. Pilonidal disease. Surg Clin N Am 2002; 1169-1185.
11
Karydakis GE. Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. ANZ J Surg 1992;62:385-389.
12
Kitchen PRB. Pilonidal sinus experience with the Karydakis flap. Br J Surg 1996; 83: 1452-1455.
13
Anyanwu AC, Hossain S, Williams A, Montgomery AC. Karydakis operation for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease: Experience in a district general hospital. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1998;80: 197-199.
14
Ertan T, Koç M, Göçmen E et al. Does technique alter quality of life after pilonidal sinus surgery? Am J Surg 2005;190:388–392.
15
Cihan A, Menteş BB, Tatlıcıoğlu E et al. Modified Limberg flap reconstruction compares favourably with primary repair for pilonidal sinus surgery. ANZ J Surg 2004;74:238-242.
16
Unalp HR, Derici H, Kamer E et al. Lower recurrence rate for Limberg vs. V-Y flap for pilonidal sinus. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1436-1444.
17
Leventoğlu S , Özdemir S, Özçay N et al. Comparison of primary closure with Limberg Flap in the Treatment of Pilonidal Disease: Kolon Rektum Hast Derg 2008;19: 90-92.
18
Mentes BB, Leventoglu S, Cihan A et al. Modified Limberg transposition flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus. Surg Today 2004;34:419-423.
19
Kapan M, Kapan S, Pekmezci S, Durgun V. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease with Limberg flap repair. Tech Coloproctol 2002;6:27-32.
20
Azab AS, Kamal MS, Saad RA et al. Radical cure of pilonidal sinus by a transposition rhomboid flap. Br J Surg 1984;71:154-
21
Akca T, Colak T, Ustunsoy B et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing primary closure with the Limberg flap in the treatment of primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Br J Surg 2005;92:1081-1084.
22
Bissett IP, Isbister WH. The management of patients with pilonidal disease-a comparative study. ANZ J Surg 1987;57:939- 942.
23
Durgun V, Kapan M, Göksoy E ve ark. Sakrokoksigeal pilonidal sinüs tedavisinde Limberg işlemi. DTT Hastanesi Tıp Derg 1993;15:283-286.