Comparison of surgical outcome of rectopexy with and without sigmoid resection for full-thickness rectal prolapse
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
VOLUME: 23 ISSUE: 2
P: 54 - 57
June 2007

Comparison of surgical outcome of rectopexy with and without sigmoid resection for full-thickness rectal prolapse

Turk J Surg 2007;23(2):54-57
1. Erciyes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Genel Cerrahi AD, KAYSERİ
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Purpose: This study was undertaken to evaluate the necessity of sigmoid resection for rectal prolapse. Materials and Methods: Between January 2000 and January 2007, a total of 31 patients underwent rectopexy with and without sigmoid resection for rectal prolapse. The data were retropectively collected for the age, sex, previous abdominal surgery, morbidity, concomitant disease, recurrence, duration of operation, and length of hospital stay. Results: Rectopexy was performed in 18 patients (Group I), and sigmoid resection plus rectopexy was performed in 13 patients (Group II). The mean age of the patients was 57 (range,34-76) years and 74% were woman. Atelectasis and wound infections were the most frequent morbidities. The medical and surgical complication rates were not significantly different between the rectopexy and rectopexy with resection groups (P = 1.00 and P= 0.09). Although operation time was significantly different (P=0.01), length of hospital stay was not significantly different (P=0.34) among the groups. There were no recurrence or mortality. Conclusion: Although the number of patients is small and this feature restricts the study, our experience indicates that rectopexy with and without sigmoid resection were safe, and effective for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Sigmoid resection did not increase morbidity. It is well suited to patients with a long redundant sigmoid and history of constipation.

Keywords:
Rectal prolapse, rectopexy, sigmoid resection

References

1
Jacobs LK, Lin YJ, Orkin BA. The best operation for rectal prolapse. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77: 44-70.
2
Felt-Bersma RJ, Cuesto MA. Rectal prolapse, rectal intusseption, rectocele and solitary ulcer syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2001; 30: 199-222.
3
Wassef R, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Rectal prolapse. Curr Probl Surg 1986; 23: 397-451.
4
Whitlow CB, Beck DE, Opelka FG et al. Perineal repair of rectal prolapse. J State Med Soc 1997; 149: 22-26.
5
Siproudhis L, Bellisant E, Juguet F et al. Rectal adaptation to distention in patients with overt rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1998; 85: 1527-1532.
6
Moschcowitz AV. The pathogenesis, anatomy and cure of prolapse of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1912; 15: 7-21.
7
Parks AG, Swash M, Urich H. Sphincter denervation in anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse. Gut 1977; 18: 656-665.
8
Broden B, Snellman B. Procidentia of the rectum studied with cineradiography. Dis Colon Rectum 1968; 11: 330-347.
9
Kuijpers HC. Treatment of complete rectal prolapse: to narrow, to wrap, to suspend, to fix, to encircle, to plicate or to resect? World J Surg 1992; 16: 826-830.
10
Moody RL. Rectal prolapse. In: Morson BC (ed). Disease of the colon, rectum and anus. Appleton- Century-Crofts, 1999, New York, pp 238-250.
11
Madoff RD, Williams JG, Wong WD et al. Long term functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapse. Am J Gastroenterol 1992; 87: 101-104.
12
Huber FT, Stein H, Siewert JR. Functional results after treatment of rectal prolapse with rectopexy and sigmoid resection. World J Surg 1995; 19: 138-143.
13
Farouk R, Duthie GS, MacGregor AB, et al. Rectoanal inhibition and incontinence in patients with rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 743-746.
14
Snooks SJ, Henery MM, Swash M. Anorectal incontinence and rectal prolapse: differential assessment of the innervation of puborectalis and external anal sphincter muscles. Gut 1985; 26: 470-476.
15
Speakman CT, Madden MW, Nicholls RJ et al. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrences: results of prospective, randomised study. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 1431-1433.
16
Deen KI, Grant E, Billingham C et al. Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 302-304.
17
Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. A comparison between Marlex and resection rectopexy. Neth J Surg 1989; 41: 136-139.
18
McKee RF, Lauder JC, Poon FW. A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992; 174: 145-148.
19
Atkinson KG, Taylor DC. Wells procedure for complete rectal prolapse: a 10 year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 1984; 27: 96-98.
20
Gourgiotis S, Baratris. Rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 2007; 22: 231-243.
21
Ashari LHS, Lumley JW, Stevenson ARL, et al. Laparoscopically assisted resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: ten years' experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 48: 982-987.
22
Kim DS, Tsang CB, Wong WD et al. Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 460-469.
23
Corman ML. An abdominal repair for complete rectal prolapse. ANZ J Surg 1988; 58: 499-503.