Abstract
Purpose: This experimental study was planned to investigate whether intraabdominal cleaning with moist compresses or intraabdominal washing with saline, which is a frequently used method, has more decreasing effect on formation of postoperative peritoneal adhesion after the source control in gastric perforations.
Material and method: In this study 40 male Wistar albino rats were divided into four equal groups. 1st group was assigned as control group and laparotomy was done without gastric perforation and abdomen was closed. Gastric perforation was applied to other groups and one hour later gastric primary repair was done and the abdomen was closed without cleaning, after washing with saline and after cleaning with moist compresses, respectively. All rats were sacrificed on the 7th post-operative day and adhesions were staged according to the Evans method. Peritoneal samples were taken from all rats and rat specific tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor1 (PAI-1) were studied.
Results: Adhesion scores were found lower in compress groups than other groups. The t-PA levels studied from the peritoneal samples on the 7th post-operative day were observed to increase in the compress group. The PAI-1 levels were highest in the saline group.
Conclusion: Our study showed that intra-abdominal cleaning with moist compresses after gastric perforations causes less adhesion than saline irrigation. Studies on peritoneal samples showed that the t-PA level, which prevents adhesion formation, increased in the compress group while the PAI-1 level, which is related to the increased adhesions, increased in saline group.
Keywords:
Peritoneal adhesion, peritoneal lavage, dry cleaning, gastric perforation
References
1Ellis H. The cause and prevention of postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1971; 133:497–511.
2Sayek I, Baykal A. In Sayek I, Çoker A, Sökmen S. Eds. Cerrahi İnfeksiyon. Güneş Kitabevi, 2001:I, 310–360.
3Aprahamian C, Wittmann DH. Operative management of intraabdominal infection. Infection 19:453, 1991. doi:10.1007/ BF01726464
4Kotan Ç, Karaayvaz M, Daşdemir İ, ve ark. İntraabdominal İnfeksiyonlarin Cerrahi Tedavisinde Peritoneal Kuru Temizleme Yönteminin Etkinliği. Van Tıp Dergisi 1999; 6:22–25.
5Tarhan OR, Barut I, Sutcu R, et al. Pentoxifylline, a methyl xanthine derivative, reduces peritoneal adhesions and increases peritoneal fibrinolysis in rats. Tohoku J Exp Med 2006; 209:249–255. doi:10.1620/tjem.209.249
6Ivarsson ML, Bergstrom M, Eriksson E, Risberg B, Holmdahl L. Tissue markers as predictors of postoperative adhesions. Br J Surg 1998; 85:1549–1554. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00859.x
7Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951; 193:265–275.
8Replogle RL, Johnson R, Gross EC. Prevention of postorerative adhesions with combined promethasine and dexamethasone therapy. Ann Surg. 163:580, 1966. doi:10.1097/00000658-196604000-00011
9Dinsmore RC, Calton WC Jr, Harvey SB, et al. Prevention of adhesions to polypropylene mesh in a traumatized bowel model. J Am Coll Surg 2000; 191:131–136. doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00337-9
10Treutner KH, Bertram P, Lerch MM, et al. Prevention of postoperative adhesions by single intraperitoneal medication. J Surg Res 1995; 59:764. doi:10.1006/ jsre.1995.1237
11Sortini D, Feo CV, Marevegias K, et al. Role of peritoneal lavage in adhesion formation and survival rate in rats: an experimental study. J Invest Surg 2006; 15:291–297. doi:10.1080/08941930600889409
12Larsson B, Lalos O, Marsk L, et al. Effect of intraperitoneal instillation of 32% dextran 70 on postoperative adhesion formation after tubal surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1985; 64:437. doi:10.3109/00016348509155163
13Tarhan OR, Barut İ, Sezik M. An evaluation of normal saline and taurolidine on intraabdominal adhesion formation and peritoneal fibrinolysis. J Surg Res 144: 151–157, 2008. doi:10.1016/j. jss.2007.09.006
14Akyol C. Ameliyatta kullanılan kompres postoperatif intraabdominal yapışıklığa neden oluyor mu? Ankara Ü. Tıp Fakültesi Genel Cerrahi. Tıpta Uzmanlık Tezi, 2008.
15Milligan DW, Raftery AT. Observations on the pathogenesis of peritoneal adhesions: a light and electron microscopal study. Br J Surg 1974; 61:274–280. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800610406
16Eroglu A, Demirci S, Kurtman C, et al. Prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions by using Seprafilm in rats undergoing bowel resection and radiation therapy. Colorectal Dis 2001; 3:33–37. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2001.00174.x
17Menzies D, Ellis H. The role of plasminogen activator in adhesion prevention. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991; 172:362–366.
18Vipond MN, Whawell SA, Thompson JN, et al. Peritoneal fibrinolytic activity and intra-abdominal adhesions. Lancet 1990; 335:1120–1122. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(90)91125-T
19Whawell SA, Vipond MN, Scott-Coombes DM, et al. Plasminogen activator inhibitor 2 reduces peritoneal fibrinolytic activity in inflammation. Br J Surg 1993; 80:107–109. doi:10.1002/bjs.1800800134