Factors affecting the formation of lymphedema due to breast cancer (Is primary systemic treatment an independent factor in the formation of breast cancer related lymphedema?)
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
E-PUB
11 August 2025

Factors affecting the formation of lymphedema due to breast cancer (Is primary systemic treatment an independent factor in the formation of breast cancer related lymphedema?)

Turk J Surg. Published online 11 August 2025.
1. Department of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye
2. Department of General Surgery, İstanbul Okan University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 16.05.2025
Accepted Date: 28.07.2025
E-Pub Date: 11.08.2025
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the local and systemic risk factors associated with breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), with a focus on whether primary systemic treatment (PST), particularly taxane-based chemotherapy, is an independent risk factor.

Material and Methods

A prospective clinical study was conducted on 80 breast cancer patients discussed at our institution’s weekly breast cancer council. Patients were grouped based on PST status. Clinical examinations and measurements were performed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Only the operated arm was assessed using tape measurements and the truncated cone formula. Arm volumes were calculated, and lymphedema (LE) was diagnosed based on a volume difference (≥200 mL or ≥2 cm circumference).

Results

No statistically significant differences were found between PST and non-PST groups regarding age, body mass index, menopausal status, smoking, or tumor characteristics. LE was detected in 7 (8.8%) patients, all Stage 1. PST and taxane-based chemotherapy were not significantly associated with LE development. However, seroma presence (p=0.038) and axillary radiotherapy (p=0.043) were significantly associated with LE. Arm volume increase was most significant at 1 and 18 months postoperatively (p=0.055 and p=0.044, respectively).

Conclusion

PST, including taxane-based chemotherapy, does not appear to be an independent risk factor for BCRL. In contrast, postoperative seroma and axillary radiotherapy are significantly associated with LE development. Early identification and management strategies should target these modifiable factors to reduce the risk of LE.

Keywords:
Breast cancer, primary systemic treatment, lymphedema, radiotherapy, sentinel lymph node biopsy, risk factors

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy among women. Increased survival rates due to early detection and systemic treatment have led to a rise in treatment-related complications, particularly lymphedema (LE), which is influenced by multiple factors, including obesity, surgical intervention, radiotherapy (RT), and possibly primary systemic treatment (PST), and significantly impairs quality of life (1). The role of PST, especially taxane-based regimens, in LE development remains controversial (1-3).

This study investigates whether PST is an independent risk factor for LE, and identifies other potential predictors by comparing patients who did and did not receive PST.

MATERIAL and METHODS

Study Population and Design

Patients diagnosed with breast cancer are evaluated in the breast council and their treatments are planned. Among these patients, those who agreed to participate in the study, accepted the necessary follow-up and measurements to be made at the required time intervals and were included in the study. After Ethics Committee approval from the University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital (decision no.: 69/21, date: 10 May 2022), 80 patients were prospectively enrolled. Participants were grouped based on PST status. According to the treatment plan, LE follow-up, examination, and measurements were recorded  at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months before and after PST (n=40) and/or surgery (n=40) (Figure 1). All patients came for follow-up for at least 2 years.

Measurements

Arm volume of the operated side was calculated using circumferential tape measurements at 7 cm intervals and the truncated cone formula.

Circumferential measurements were initiated at the ulnar styloid process, with subsequent measurements taken at 7-cm intervals. The volume of each conical segment was calculated using the following formula, and the differences in volume between the arms were analyzed:

• V: upper extremity volume

• C: circumference of the lower segment

• c: circumference of the upper segment

• p: 3.14

• h: distance between the measurements (set as 7 cm in this study).

LE was defined by a volume difference of  ≥200 mL or a circumference difference ≥2 cm. Arm volume differences over time were also analyzed.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS v25. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, Mann-Whitney U, chi-square, and repeated measures ANOVA were employed. P<0.05 was considered significant

All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows, version 25.0.

RESULTS

Among 80 patients, LE was detected in 7 (8.8%), all of whom had Stage 1 LE (1, 4). These patients were advised to elevate their limbs, to receive manual massage, and were followed up clinically, without any progression of their condition. The characteristics of the surgical techniques employed and the distribution of lymph nodes and tumor types are summarized in Table 1. When PST status, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy were evaluated separately, no statistically significant differences were observed between patients with and without LE. Likewise, the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches regarding LE did not differ significantly (Table 2).

Axillary RT (71.4% in LE group vs. 32.9% in non-LE group; p=0.043) and seroma (85.7% vs. 38.4%; p=0.038) were significantly associated with LE (Table 3).

When the measurements of both arms were considered during both the preoperative and postoperative periods, an increase in the left arm measurement was observed in patients with LE at 1 month postoperatively (Table 4). Moreover, when the relationship between inter-arm volume difference and LE was examined, the values at 1 and 18 months postoperatively were found to be significantly different (Table 5).

Volume differences in the operated arm were observed at 1 and 18 months in the LE group (p=0.055 and 0.044, respectively).

In all patients diagnosed with LE (whether right or left), the dominant side was the right. In the subgroup of patients with a right dominant arm, the measurements and their corresponding arm volumes for both right and left arms for patients with and without LE are illustrated in Figures 2 and 3. Although the median values did not reveal a significant difference overall, the 1- and 18-month time points were particularly notable.

At 1 month postoperatively, total arm volume was higher in patients with LE, reaching borderline statistical significance (p=0.055). At 18 months, the volume difference in patients with LE was significantly higher (p=0.044) (Figure 4).

DISCUSSION

The incidence of breast cancer is increasing, and advances in diagnosis and treatment are prolonging patient survival, while breast cancer treatment-related LE ranges from 8.4% to 21.4%, consistent with figures reported in the literature (4-6). Furthermore, its relationship with age has been examined, and age is not directly associated with the development of LE (7, 8). A retrospective study by Donahue et al. (8) found that smoking did not affect the development of breast cancer-related LE over a 3-year follow-up period. These findings are consistent with our results.

Although direct comparisons of LE rates have not been made in studies that have focused predominantly on non-invasive methods for axillary staging, there is strong evidence to support the idea that even minimal surgical interventions in the axilla may affect the planning of diagnostic and treatment strategies. However, no significant differences were detected (9, 10). A study by Nakagawa et al. (11) suggested that Chemotherapy may be a causal factor for LE. Their aimed was to determine whether chemotherapy affects the lymphatic vessels and blood vessels in the skin and subcutaneous fat and to investigate  how these Changes relate to the degree of edema after Chemotherapy. In contrast, several studies have shown that neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially taxane-based agents, plays a role in the development of breast cancer-associated LE by increasing capillary permeability and promoting protein accumulation in the interstitial space. In a prospective study conducted by Nguyen Stringer et al. (12), only 74 out of 273 patients who underwent an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) developed breast cancer-associated LE. Notably, all of these patients received taxane-based chemotherapy. The risk of developing LE was found to be three times higher in patients who received taxane-based chemotherapy than in those who did not (12-14). In contrast, in a prospective cohort study conducted by Montagna et al. (15), when the risk and findings were analyzed, no statistically significant difference was observed in the rates of LE according to the chemotherapy regimen. When taxane-based regimens were evaluated as a separate group (n=31), statistical analysis yielded a p-value of 0.490. In our series, no significant difference was found between the groups receiving and not receiving Taxane-based chemotherapy.

The risk of breast cancer-associated LE was strongly associated with ALND. There are different results in studies on this subject, and it is known that routine ALND increases the rate of LE when it is performed for curettage rather than for staging purposes. No relationship was observed between axillary surgery for diagnosis or staging purposes and LE in our series. A large prospective study by Warren et al. (16) showed that axillary RT significantly increased the risk of LE compared with whole breast/chest wall irradiation. Similarly, a 15-year follow-up study by Poortmans et al. (17).

Breast cancer LE as a risk factor for RT. Axillary RT was a risk factor for LE (p=0.043), while RT to the whole breast and chest wall was not associated with a risk of LE (p=1.00). Axillary management and its universal approaches have become a focus in recent years. Numerous studies, along with relevant reviews and meta-analyses, emphasize minimizing the extent of axillary surgery (18). The risk of breast cancer-associated LE was most strongly associated with ALND. There are different results in studies on this subject, it is known that routine ALND increases the rate of LE when performed for curettage rather than staging purposes (18). It is widely accepted that the origin of breast cancer LE is multifactorial (19, 20) and can be modified by the city, surgical techniques, and extent of lymph node dissection after surgery.

A study published in 2019 showed that lymph node metastasis is a significant risk factor for the development of LE in breast cancer patients. In addition, the risk of LE was associated with the number and characteristics of metastatic lymph nodes. In independent lymphadenectomy (LE) with 10 or more metastatic lymph nodes, the risk was 1.78 times higher than in those with three or fewer metastatic lymph nodes and 2.17 times higher than in those without lymph node metastasis (21). Similar studies with a 5 year follow-up have shown that both axillary lymph node metastases and advanced cancer stage are associated with LE (22, 23). In our series, the detection of LE was more frequent in patients who received PST, which is consistent with information about the relationship between cancer stage and LE. However, an analysis was not performed on this relationship. No relationship was observed between axillary surgery for diagnosis or staging purposes and LE. Additionally, when considered in terms of the number of LE nodes, no association with LE was detected in our patients who underwent axillary surgery for staging purposes, and the number of lymph nodes was limited.

In a retrospective cohort study conducted by Toyserkani et al. (24), involving all unilateral breast cancer patients treated between 2008 and 2014, LE was developed in 291 out of 1,822 patients, with seroma being identified as an independent risk factor. In contrast, a prospective study by Koelmeyer et al. (25) found no significant association between seroma and breast cancer-related LE. The surgeon’s patient volume and experience may be effective in this regard (26). Our patients were operated on by physicians experienced in breast surgery; however, only two of the patients diagnosed with LE (25%) were operated on specifically by a breast surgeon.

To summarize, the LE incidence rate of 8.8% aligns with prior literature. Although some studies implicate PST and taxanes in LE development, our findings do not support this association. Axillary RT and postoperative seroma were the only modifiable risk factors significantly linked to LE. Dominant arm status and surgeon experience were also explored, though conclusions were limited by sample size. With close and regular follow-up, early diagnosis and a conservative approach, LE can be kept under control. In our very limited series of patients, the stage in terms of LE remained the same during follow-up.

Study Limitations

The study’s prospective design and consistent measurement protocol strengthens its findings, though the small number of LE cases and limited statistical power remain limitations.

CONCLUSION

This study aimed to determine to determine whether PST (especially taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy) is an independent risk factor for breast cancer-associated LE and to evaluate the impact of early diagnosis and prevention on quality of life.

Our results did not reveal a statistically significant association between PST or taxane-based chemotherapy and LE. However, postoperative seroma and axillary RT were significantly associated with the development of LE.

We conclude that early LE may be related to surgical factors and seroma, while later LE is likely related to RT. Emphasis should be placed on longer follow-up of patients and on early diagnosis and preventive strategies.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: After Ethics Committee approval from the University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital (decision no.: 69/21, date: 10 May 2022), 80 patients were prospectively enrolled.
Informed Consent: Informed consent documents, obtained before treatment from each patient are available in patient files.

Acknowledgments

The Authors declared that the research was conducted according to the principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki “Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects”, (amended in October 2013).
The authors would like to thank ENAGO– https://www.enago.com.tr/ceviri/ for  the English language review and their assistance in manuscript editing.

Author Contributions

Concept - M.K., S.G.; Design - M.K., S.G.; Data Collection or Processing - S.G.; Analysis or Interpretation - S.G., B.G.; Literature Search - M.K., S.G., B.G.; Writing - M.K., S.G.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
McLaughlin SA, Brunelle CL, Taghian A. Breast cancer-related lymphedema: risk factors, screening, management, and the impact of locoregional treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:2341-2350.
2
Kim JS, Kim JH, Chang JH, Kim DW, Shin KH. Prediction of breast cancer-related lymphedema risk after postoperative radiotherapy via multivariable logistic regression analysis. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1026043.
3
Park S, Lee JE, Yu J, Paik HJ, Ryu JM, Kim I, et al. Risk factors affecting breast cancer-related lymphedema: serial body weight change during neoadjuvant anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide followed by taxane. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018;18:e49-e54.
4
DiSipio T, Rye S, Newman B, Hayes S. Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:500-515.
5
Lawenda BD, Mondry TE, Johnstone PA. Lymphedema: a primer on the identification and management of a chronic condition in oncologic treatment. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:8-24.
6
Hayes SC, Janda M, Cornish B, Battistutta D, Newman B. Lymphedema after breast cancer: incidence, risk factors, and effect on upper body function. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3536-3542.
7
Ahn HR, Jeong HE, Jeong C, Kang SY, Jung SH, Youn HJ, et al. Incidence and risk factors of breast cancer-related lymphedema in Korea: a nationwide retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2024;110:3518-3526.
8
Donahue PMC, MacKenzie A, Filipovic A, Koelmeyer L. Advances in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023;200:1-14.
9
Noguchi M, Inokuchi M, Yokoi-Noguchi M, Morioka E, Haba Y. Conservative axillary surgery may prevent arm lymphedema without increasing axillary recurrence in the surgical management of breast cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15:5353.
10
Xia Y, Zheng M, Chen L, Cui Y, Huang H, Kong P, et al. Changes of lymphatic flow caused by core needle biopsy of axillary sentinel lymph node in a rabbit model. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10:1480-1487.
11
Nakagawa A, Fujimoto H, Nagashima T, Sangai T, Takada M, Masuda T, et al. Histological features of skin and subcutaneous tissue in patients with breast cancer who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and their relationship to post-treatment edema. Breast Cancer. 2020;27:77-84.
12
Nguyen TT, Hoskin TL, Habermann EB, Cheville AL, Boughey JC. Breast cancer-related lymphedema risk is related to multidisciplinary treatment and not surgery alone: results from a large cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:2972-2980.
13
Lee MJ, Beith J, Ward L, Kilbreath S. Lymphedema following taxane-based chemotherapy in women with early breast cancer. Lymphat Res Biol. 2014;12:282-288.
14
Swaroop MN, Ferguson CM, Horick NK, Skolny MN, Miller CL, Jammallo LS, et al. Impact of adjuvant taxane-based chemotherapy on development of breast cancer-related lymphedema: results from a large prospective cohort. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;151:393-403.
15
Montagna G, Zhang J, Sevilimedu V, Charyn J, Abbate K, Gomez EA, et al. Risk factors and racial and ethnic disparities in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:1195-1200.
16
Warren LE, Miller CL, Horick N, Skolny MN, Jammallo LS, Sadek BT, et al. The impact of radiation therapy on the risk of lymphedema after treatment for breast cancer: a prospective cohort study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88:565-571.
17
Poortmans PM, Weltens C, Fortpied C, Kirkove C, Peignaux-Casasnovas K, Budach V, et al. Internal mammary and medial supraclavicular lymph node chain irradiation in stage I-III breast cancer (EORTC 22922/10925): 15-year results of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:1602-1610. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:e5.
18
Axillary management for patients with in-situ and invasive breast cancer: a concise overview. The American Society of Breast Surgeons. 2022.
19
Stamatakos M, Stefanaki C, Kontzoglou K. Lymphedema and breast cancer: a review of the literature. Breast Cancer. 2011;18:174-180. Erratum in: Breast Cancer. 2011;18:181. Michael, Stamatakos [corrected to Stamatakos, Michael]; Charikleia, Stefanaki [corrected to Stefanaki, Charikleia]; Konstantinos, Kontzoglou [corrected to Kontzoglou, Konstantinos].
20
Dominick SA, Madlensky L, Natarajan L, Pierce JP. Risk factors associated with breast cancer-related lymphedema in the WHEL study. J Cancer Surviv. 2013;7:115-123.
21
Zhang X, Tang B, Zou D, Yang H, Qiao E, He X, et al. Discussion of relationships among changes of pathological indicators, postoperative lymphedema of the upper limb, and prognosis of patients with breast cancer. Biosci Rep. 2019;39:BSR20190231. Erratum in: Biosci Rep. 2019;39:BSR-20190231_COR.
22
Penn IW, Chang YC, Chuang E, Chen CM, Chung CF, Kuo CY, et al. Risk factors and prediction model for persistent breast-cancer-related lymphedema: a 5-year cohort study. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27:991-1000.
23
Ridner SH, Shah C, Boyages J, Koelmeyer L, Ajkay N, DeSnyder SM, et al. L-Dex, arm volume, and symptom trajectories 24 months after breast cancer surgery. Cancer Med. 2020;9:5164-5173.
24
Toyserkani NM, Jørgensen MG, Haugaard K, Sørensen JA. Seroma indicates increased risk of lymphedema following breast cancer treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Breast. 2017;32:102-104.
25
Koelmeyer LA, Gaitatzis K, Dietrich MS, Shah CS, Boyages J, McLaughlin SA, et al. Risk factors for breast cancer-related lymphedema in patients undergoing 3 years of prospective surveillance with intervention. Cancer. 2022;128:3408-3415.
26
DeSnyder SM, Yi M, Boccardo F, Feldman S, Klimberg VS, Smith M, et al. American Society of Breast Surgeons’ practice patterns for patients at risk and affected by breast cancer-related lymphedema. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:5742-5751.