Abstract
Purpose: To define the patient group who might benefit from appropriate interpectoral lymph node dissection (IPN) and to investigate skip Rotter metastases rates.
Materials and Methods: Complete axillary dissection including IPN were performed in 87 female histopathologically proven breast carcinoma patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy between 1998-2000 at Ankara Oncology Hospital. IPN group sent separately to the pathological examination. Age, menopausal status, histological diagnosis, tumoral location, tumoral mass, grade, estrogens and progesterone receptors, multicentiricity, pN stage, lymphoid capsular invasion, level I-II-III metastatic lenfoid status, and TNM stage were dependent parameters.
Results: The number of patients who had metastatic IPN were 13 (14,9%) and out of 13, 2 patients had metastatic IPN (2,3%) in the absence of axillary lymph node metastases. The independent parameters found to be statistically significant in IPN metastases are; high grade tumors, the presence of more than 2 metastatic lymph nodes, capsular invasion (pN1biii) (p<0.05). The grade was found to be most significant parameter in this study which can also be evaluated preoperatively.
Conclusion: As metastases in unexcised IPN may become a source of local or systemic treatment failure and understaging parameter, IPN should be excised carefully in breast carcinoma patients who have high grade tumors, signs of capsular invasion of the lymph nodes and who have two or more metastatic axillary lymph nodes clinically or during the operation.
Keywords:
Rotter's lymph node, interpectoral, breast cancer
References
1Cody HS, Egeli RA, Urban JA. Rotter\'s node metastases, therapeutic and prognostic considerations in early breast carcinoma. Ann Surg, 1984;199:266-270.
2Dixon JM, Dobie V, Chetty U. The importance of interpectoral nodes in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer, 1993;3:334-336.
3Durkin K, Haagensen CD. An improved technique for the study of lymph nodes in surgical specimens. Ann Surg 1980;91:419-429.
4Oran I, Memiş A, Üstün EE. Ultrasonographic detection of interpectoral (Rotter\'s) node involvement in breast cancer. J Clin Ultrasound, 1996;24:519-22.
5Vrdoljak DV, Ramljak V, Muzina D et al. Analysis of metastatic involvement of interpectoral (Rotter\'s) lymph nodes related to tumor location, size, grade and hormone receptor status in breast cancer. Tumori, 2005;91:177-81.
6Ouyang T, Li JF, Wang TF et al. Exploration of the extent of axillary dissection for patients with node positive primary breast cancer. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2005;43:298-300.
7Chevinsky AH, Ferrara J, James AG et al. Prospective evaluation of clinical and pathologic detection of axillary metastases in patients with carcinoma of the breast. Surgery, 1990;108,4:612-618.
8Boova RS, Bonanni R, Rosato FE. Patterns of axillary node involvement in breast cancer: predictability of level one dissection. Ann Surg, 1982;196:642-644.
9Hermann RE, Esselstyn CB, Crile G. Results of conservative operations for breast cancer. Arch Surg, 1985;120:746-751.
10Harris JR, Hellman S, Kinne DW. Limited surgery and radiotherapy for early breast cancer. N Eng J Med, 1985;313:1365-1368.
11Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of early breast cancer. N Eng J Med, 1985;312:665-673.
12Cascinelli N, Grace M, Bufalino R, et al. Prognosis of breast cancer with axillary node metastases after surgical treatment only. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol, 1987;23:795-799.
13Davies GC, Millis RR, Hayward JL. Assessment of axillary lymph node status. Ann Surg, 1980;192:148-151.
14Sacre RA. Clinical evaluation of axillary lymph nodes compared to surgical and pathologic findings. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol, 1986;12:169-173.
15Forrest APM, Stewart HJ, Roberts MM, Steele RJC. Simple mastectomy and axillary node sampling (pectoral node biopsy) in the management of primary breast cancer. Ann Surg, 1982;196:371-378.
16Fisher B, Wolmark N, Bauer M, et al. The accuracy of clinical node staging and of limited axillary dissection as a determinant of histologic nodal status in carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1981;152:765-772.
17Schwartz GF, Rosenberg AL, Danoff BF, et al. Lumpectomy and level I axillary dissection prior to irradiation for operable breast cancer. Ann Surg, 1984;200:554-560.
18Kissin MW, Thompson EM, Price AB, et al. The inadequacy of axillary sampling in breast cancer. Lancet, 1982;I:1210-1212.
19Uren RF, Howman-Giles RB, Chung D et al. Role of lymphoscintigraphy for selective sentinel lymphadenectomy. Cancer Treat Res, 2005;127,15-38
20Uren RF, Howman-Giles RB, Renwick SB et al. Lymphatic mapping of the breast: locating the sentinel lymph nodes. World J Surg, 2001;25:789-93.
21Estourgie SH, Nieweg OE, Olmos RA et al. Lymphatic drainage patterns from the breast. Ann Surg, 2004;239:232-7.
22Leidenius MH, Ortiz A, Ronka RH et al. Complete lymphatic staging in breast cancer by lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node biopsy. Int Surg, 2002;87:160-3.
23Bale A, Gardner B, Shende M et al. Can interpectoral nodes be sentinel nodes? Am J Surg, 1999;178:360-1.
24Lerman H, Metser U, Lievshitz G et al. Lymphoscintigraphic sentinel node identification in patients with breast cancer: the role of SPECT-CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2005;12.
25Rosen PP, Lesser ML, Kinne DW, Beattie EJ. Discontinuous or \"skip\" metastasis in breast carcinoma. Ann Surg, 1983;197:276-283.
26Pigott J, Nichols R, Maddox WA, Balch CM. Metastases to the upper levels of the axillary nodes in carcinoma of the breast and its implications for nodal sampling procedures. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1984;158:255-259.
27Senofsky GM, Moffat FL, Davis K, et al. Total axillary lymphadenectomy in the managemant of breast cancer. Arch Surg, 1991;126:1336-1342.
28Chandawarkar RY, Shinde SR. İnterpectoral nodes in carcinoma of the breast. Requiem or resurrection. J Surg Oncol, 1996;62:158-161
29Komenaka IK, Bauer VP, Schnabel FR et al. Interpectoral nodes as initial site of recurrence in breast cancer. Arch Surg, 2004;139:175-8.
