Abstract
Purpose: The recurrence rates after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair are very high. In the recent years, hiatal hernia repair using mesh has gained popularity because of the recurrences. In this study, the application technique, prosthetic indications and early results are discussed in accordance with the current literature.
Methods: Forty five patients, ages between 29-71, underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair between June 2008-July 2011. In fourteen (9 male, 5 female) patients cruroplasty was supported by mesh. Five of these patients underwent redo surgery.
Results: We performed mesh repair in 14 patients with weak crus structure, recurrence hernia and wide hiatal defect. In redo surgery of 5 patients, we identified stenosis in one case due to previously applied polypropilen mesh, in three cases detachment of cruroplasty sutures and in one case sliding hernia. Cruroplasty, Nissen fundoplication and mesh repair were applied to all of these patients. No complications were detected in peroperative and postoperative periods. Four patients had temporary dysphagia symptoms in the early follow-up period for 2 to 6 months.
Conclusion: The prosthetic repair of hiatal hernia has advantages as well as some problems. The patients did not have any problems due to repair with mesh in the follow-up period. We wait for the long term results currently. In our opinion, due to the high risk ratio of recurrence, using mesh in the selected patients would be advantageous to reduce the risk of recurrence in hiatal hernia.
Keywords:
hiatal hernia, mesh, cruroplasty, dysphagia
References
1Wright RA, Hurwitz AL. Relationship of hiatal hernia to endoscopically proved reflux esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 1979; 24:311-313. doi:10.1007/BF01296546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01296546
2Herbella FA, Patti MG, Del Grande JC. Hiatal mesh repair- current status. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011; 21:61-66. doi:10.1097/ SLE.0b013e31820e6e2a http://dx.doi. org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e31820e6e2a doi:10.1007/s11605-011-1608-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011- 1608-5
3Allison PR. Reflux esophagitis, sliding hernia and the anatomy of repair. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1951; 92:419-431.
4Fusco EM. The repair of hiatus hernia with tantalum mesh Milit Med. 1960; 125:189-190.
5Sorricelli E, Bossa N, Genco A, Cipriano M. Longterm results of hiatal hernia mesh repair and antireflux laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2009; 23:2499-2504.
6Basso N, Rosato P, De Leo A et al. Tension free hiatoplasty, gastropheric anchorage, and 360 fundoplication in the laparoscopic treatment of paraesophageal hernia. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1999; 9:257-262. doi:10.1097/00129689-199908000-00005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00129689- 199908000-00005
7Edelman DS. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair with mesh. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995; 5:32-37.
8Hui TT, David T, Spyrou M et al. Mesh crural repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernias Am Surg 2001; 67:1170-1174.
9Turkcapar A, Kepenekçi İ, Mahmoud H, Tuzuner A. Laparoscopic fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure World J Surg 2007; 31:2168. doi:10.1007/s00268- 007-9275-0 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007- 9275-0
10Champion JK, Rock D. Laparoscopic mesh cruroplasty for large paraesophageal hernias. Surg Endosc 2003; 17:551- 553. doi:10.1007/s00464-002-8817-7 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002- 8817-7
11Lee E , Frisella MM, Matthews BD et al. Evaluation of cellular human dermis reinforcement of the crural closure in patients with difficult hiatal hernias. Surg Endosc 2007; 21:641-645. doi:10.1007/ s00464-006-9117-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006- 9117-4
12Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Schweiger UM et al. Laparoscopic refundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure for recurrent hiatal hernia after primary failed antireflux surgery Arch Surg 2003; 138:902-907. doi:10.1001/archsurg.138.8.902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.
138.902 doi:10.1007/s00384-002-0405-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-002- 0405-8 doi:10.1007/s00464-002-8504-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002- 8504-8
14Gryska PV, Vernon JK. Tention-free repair of hiatal hernia during laparoscopic fundoplication: a ten-year experience. Hernia 2005; 9:150-155. doi:10.1007/ s10029-004-0312-8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-004- 0312-8
15Antoniou SA, Pointer R, Granderath FA. Hiatal hernia repair with the use of biologic meshes. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2011; 21:1-9. doi:10.1097/ SLE.0b013e31820ad56c http://dx.doi. org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e31820ad56c doi:10.1007/s11605-011-1565-z http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-011- 1565-z
16Griffith PS, Valentia V, Qurashia K, et al. Rejection of goretex mesh used in prosthetic cruroplasty. A case series. Int J Surg 2008; 6:106-109. doi:10.1016/j. ijsu.2007.12.004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ijsu.2007.12.004
17Stadlhuber RJ, Sherif AE, Mittal SK, et al. Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal clouse: a 28 case series. Surg Endosc 2009; 23:1219-1226. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0205-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008- 0205-5
18Jenkins ED, Lerdsirisopon S, Costello KP et al. Laparoscopic fixation of biologic mesh at the hiatus with fibrin or polyethylene glycol sealant in a porcine model. Surg Endosc 2011; 19. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1741-y http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011- 1741-y
19Kemppainene E, Kiviluoto T. Fatal cardiac tamponade after emergency tension free repair of a large paraesophageal hernia. Surg Endosc 2000; 14:593.