Planar lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT in detection of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Review Article
VOLUME: 28 ISSUE: 4
P: 201 - 206
December 2012

Planar lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT in detection of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer

Turk J Surg 2012;28(4):201-206
1. Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Nükleer Tıp Kliniği, Ankara, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

The lymph node status is very important for the prognosis and treatment in patients with breast cancer. The sentinel lymph node is the first node to which lymphatic drainage and metastasis from the primary tumor occurs. The sentinel lymph node detection and biopsy have already been implemented into clinical practice in breast cancer. Planar lymphoscintigraphy, blue dye and intraoperative gamma probe are used for detection of the the sentinel lymph node and lymphatic drainage. Planar lymphoscintigraphy usually determines the sentinel lymph node in all patients. However, planar lymphoscintigraphy is not adequate for the precise anatomic localization of the sentinel lymph node, or sometimes lymphatic drainage may not be shown at all. Recently, hybrid single photon emission computed tomography gamma camera-computed tomography system (SPECT/CT) has been improved. This system could help overcome these difficulties. When SPECT images are fused with the anatomical details provided by CT, accurate anatomic localization of the sentinel lymph node and lymphatic mapping can be obtained. SPECT/CT increases the sensitivity of planar lymphoscintigraphy, detects more nodes compared to planar lymphoscintigraphy, and the accurate localization of the sentinel lymph nodes acts as a guide for surgical planning. In this review, the clinical use of hybrid SPECT/ CT in the identification of the sentinel lymph node in patients with breast cancer, in comparison with planar images, literature about this subject together with our experience were presented.

Keywords:
Breast cancer, sentinel lymph node, lymphoscintigraphy, SPECT

References

1
Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, et al. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol 1993; 2: 335-339. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/0960-7404(93)90064-6 [CrossRef]
2
Koçak FS. Recent Developments in Breast Cancer Surgery. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Oncol-Special Topics 2008; 1: 11-16.
3
Hill AD, Tran KN, Akhurst T, et al. Lessons learned from 500 cases of lymphatic mapping for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1999; 229: 528-535. http://dx.doi. org/10.1097/00000658-199904000-00012 [CrossRef]
4
Borgstein PJ, Meijer S, Pijpers R. Intradermal blue dye to identify sentinel lymph-node in breast cancer. Lancet 1997; 349: 1668-1669. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)62634-7 [CrossRef]
5
Arıcan P, Peksoy İ, Naldöken S, et al. The effect of the excisional biopsy in the detection of the sentinel lymph node by lymphoscintigraphy and ıntraoperative gamma probe in breast cancer. Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy 2011; 20: 100-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/ MIRT.28 [CrossRef]
6
Nieweg OE, Jansen L, Valdes Olmos RA, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 1999; 26: 11-16. http://dx.doi. org/10.1007/s002590050572 [CrossRef]
7
Keidar Z, Israel O, Krausz Y. SPECT/ CT in tumor imaging: Technical aspects and clinical applications. Semin Nucl Med 2003; 33: 205-218. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1053/snuc.2003.127310 [CrossRef]
8
Bocher M, Balan A, Krausz Y, et al. Gamma camera-mounted anatomical X-ray tomography: technology, system characteristics and first images. Eur J Nucl Med 2000; 27: 619-627. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002590050555 [CrossRef]
9
Czemin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR. Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med 2007; 48: 78-88.
10
Von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC, Hany TF. Integrated PET/CT: current applications and future directions. Radiology 2006; 238: 405-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ radiol.2382041977 [CrossRef]
11
Buck AK, Nekolla S, Ziegler S, et al. SPECT/CT. J Nucl Med 2008; 49: 1305- 1319. http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/ jnumed.107.050195 [CrossRef]
12
Borgstein PJ, Pijpers R, Comans EF, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186: 275-
13
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1072- 7515(98)00011-8 [CrossRef]
14
Husarik DB, Steinert HC. Single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomographyfor sentinel node mapping in breast cancer. Semin Nucl Med 2007; 37: 29-33. http://dx.doi.org/
15
1053/j.semnuclmed.2006.08.001 [CrossRef]
16
van der Ploeg IM, Valdés Olmos RA, Nieweg OE, Rutgers EJ, Kroon BB, Hoefnagel CA. The additional value of SPECT/CT in lymphatic mapping in breast cancer and melanoma. J Nucl Med 2007; 48: 1756-1760. http://dx. doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.107.043372 [CrossRef]
17
van der Ploeg IM, Nieweg OE, Kroon BB, et al. The yield of SPECT/CT for anatomical lymphatic mapping in patients with breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009; 36: 903-909. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-008-1050-4 [CrossRef]
18
Lerman H, Lievshitz G, Zak O, et al. Improved sentinel node identification by SPECT/CT in overweight patients with breast cancer. J Nucl Med 2007; 48: 201-206.
19
van der Ploeg IM, Valdés Olmos RA, Kroon BB, et al. The Hybrid SPECT/ CT as an additional lymphatic mapping tool in patients with breast cancer. World J Surg 2008; 32: 1930-1934. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9618-5 [CrossRef]
20
Lerman H, Metser U, Lievshitz G, et al. Lymphoscintigraphic sentinel node identification in patients with breast cancer: the role of SPECT-CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006; 33: 329-337. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-005-1927-4 [CrossRef]
21
Ibusuki M, Yamamoto Y, Kawasoe T, et al. Potential advantage of preoperative three-dimensional mapping of sentinel nodes in breast cancer by a hybrid single photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT system. Surg Oncol 2010; 19: 88-94. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2009.04.001 [CrossRef]