Surgical management of paraesophageal (Type II hiatal) hernias: Report of four cases
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Case Reports
VOLUME: 25 ISSUE: 1
P: 33 - 39
January 2009

Surgical management of paraesophageal (Type II hiatal) hernias: Report of four cases

Turk J Surg 2009;25(1):33-39
1. Türkiye Yüksek İhtisas Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Gastroenteroloji Cerrahi Kliniği, Ankara
2. Özel Ankara Güven Hastanesi, Gastroenteroloji Cerrahi Departmanı, Ankara
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate our surgical management and outcomes of the patients with paraesophageal hernias in this study. Materials and Methods: Four patients were operated on for paraesophageal hernia in our hospital. Preoperative clinical findings, diagnostic methods, operative records, postoperative followup and results were evaluated. Results: All four patients diagnosed with paraesophageal hernia had symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease such as heartburn. Diagnostic methods included chest X-ray, barium esophagogastroduodenography, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, computed tomography, esophageal manometry and pH monitorization. The patients were operated on by the transabdominal open procedure under the elective conditions. Diaphragmatic closure was accomplished primarily in 2 patients with a hiatal defect of 5 cm or smaller. A patch of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) was used to reinforce the closure of the hiatus in 2 patients with a hiatal defect of 8 cm or larger. Mean follow-up period was 26 months (range, 8-48 months). There were no recurrences or no additional complications were noted in any patients during the followup period. Conclusion: In this study, satisfactory results for repair of paraesophageal hernia by using both primary cruroplasty alone and mesh reinforcement were achieved in the medium-term follow-up. Meticulous work-up and surgical technique are required for optimal results. The size of hiatal defect is obviously important for the selection of operative management.

Keywords:
Paraesophageal hernia, Hiatal hernia, Cruroplasty, Mesh, Graft, PTFE, Nissen fundoplication

References

1
Mittal RK. Hiatal hernia: myth or reality? Am J Med 1997;103:33-39.
2
Maziak DE, Todd TR, Pearson FG. Massive hiatus hernia: evaluation and surgical management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:53-60.
3
Mittal RK. The spectrum of diaphragmatic hernia. Hosp Pract (Minneap) 1998;33:65-66.
4
Hill LD. Incarcerated paraesophageal hernia: a surgical emergency. Am J Surg 1973;126:286-291.
5
Skinner DB, Belsey RHR, Russell PS. Surgical management of esophageal reflux and hiatus hernia. Long-term results with 1030 patients. J Thorac Cardiovascular Surg 1967;53:33-54.
6
Weiss CA 3rd, Stevens RM, Schwartz RW. Paraesophageal hernia: current diagnosis and treatment. Curr Surg 2002;59:180-182.
7
Perdikis G, Hinder RA, Filipi CJ, et al. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Arch Surg 1997;132:586-589.
8
Weinbeck M, Barnert J. Epidemiology of reflux and reflux esophagitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1989;24:7-13.
9
Karpelowsky JS, Wieselthaler N, Rode H. Primary paraesophageal hernia in children. J Pediatr Surg 2006;41:1588-1593.
10
Willekes CL, Edoga JK, Frezza EE. Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Ann Surg 1997;225:31-38.
11
Wolf PS, Oelschlager BK. Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Adv Surg 2007;41:199-210.
12
Huntington TR. Short-term outcome of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. A case series of 58 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc 1997;11:894-898.
13
Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlson MA, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. Arch Surg 2002;137:649-652.
14
Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Kamolz T, et al. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure reduces postoperative intrathoracic wrap herniation: preliminary results of a prospective randomized functional and clinical study. Arch Surg 2005;140:40-48.
15
Targarona EM, Bendahan G, Balague C, et al. Mesh in the hiatus: a controversial issue. Arch Surg 2004;139:1286-1296.
16
Matloub HS, Jensen P, Grunert BK, et al. Characteristics of prosthetic mesh and autogenous fascia in abdominal wall reconstruction after prolonged implantation. Ann Plast Surg 1992;29:508-511.
17
Geha AS, Massad MG, Snow NJ, et al. A 32-year experience in 100 patients with giant paraesophageal hernia: the case for abdominal approach and selective antireflux repair. Surgery 2000;128:623-630.
18
Fuller CB, Hagen JA, DeMeester TR, et al. The role of fundoplication in the treatment of type II paraesophageal hernia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:655-661.
19
Lal DR, Pellegrini CA, Oelschlager BK. Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Surg Clin North Am 2005;85:105-
20
Walther B, DeMeester TR, Lafontaine E, et al. Effect of paraesophageal hernia on sphincter function and its implication on surgical therapy. Am J Surg 1984;147:111-
21
Allen MS, Trastek VF, Deschamps C, et al. Intrathoracic stomach: presentation and results of operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:253-259.
22
Treacy PJ, Jamieson GG. An approach to the management of para-oesophageal hiatus hernias. Aust N Z J Surg 1987; 57:813- 817.
23
Pearson FG, Cooper JD, Ilves R, et al. Massive hiatal hernia with incarceration: a report of 53 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 1983;35:45-51.