Abstract
Purpose: Fine-needle aspiration cytology has been accepted as a part of triple test approach as well as physical examination and mammographic examination since it is a method the application of which is simple, is not expensive and is minimal invasive. Fine-needle aspiration cytology, diagnostic accuracy rate ranges between 50-95% but with triple test approach, this rate reaches to 100%. In our study, we aimed to discuss our success rates, our mistakes and their reasons along with the literature by reevaluating breast FNAC we evaluated and histopathological results of these findindgs retrospectively.
Patients and Methods: 50 incidents who came to our clinic and whose biopsies were evaluated in our clinic were taken into the study. In FNAC done from 50 palpable breast lesions in total, 8 specimen were reported as nondiagnostic, 21 specimen were reported as benign, 6 specimen were reported to be suspectful of malignancy and 15 specimen were reported as malignant.
Results: Sensitivity, specifity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false positive rate and false negative rate were calculated as 100%, 95%, 93%, 100%, 2,3% and 0% respectively. The accuracy rate of the test is 97%.
Conclusion: Consequently, in the light of the data in our study and literature, we could say that FNAC, a part of triple test approach, will be an indispensable diagnosis method in the hands of an experienced clinician and pathologist and will prevent unnecessary surgical interventions.
Keywords:
Breast, breast mass, cytology, histopathology, correlation
References
1Chaiwun B, Thorner P. Fine needle aspiration for evaluation of breast masses. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 19: 48-55.
2Ariga R, Bloom K, Reddy VB, Kluskens L, Francescatti D, Dowlat K, Siziopikou P, Gattuso P. Fine needle aspiration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation. Am J Surg 2002; 184: 410-413.
3Rezanko T, Tuğyan N, Dağ F, Aydın Ergun S. Meme ince iğne aspirasyon sitolojilerinde gerçek gri zon. Türk Patoloji Dergisi 2002; 18:44-48.
4O'Neil S, Castelli M, Gattuso P, Kluskens L, Madsen K, Aranha G. Fine needle aspiration of 697 palpable breast lesions with histopathologic correlation. Surgery 1997;122: 824-828.
5Pacinda SJ, Ramzy I. Fine needle aspiration of breast masses. J Adolesc Health 1998; 23: 3-6.
6Dominguez F, Riare JR, Tojo S, Junco P. Fine needle aspiration of breast masses. Acta Cythologica 1997; 41: 341-346.
7Jayaram GM, Alhady SF. Cythological analysis of breast lesion: A review of 780 cases. Malaysian Pathol 1996; 18: 81-87.
8Tanaka K, Shoji T, Tominaga Y, Nakagawa H, Yamamoya D, Kawanıshı H, Sakaıda N, Okamura A, Hıokı K. Statistical analysis of diagnostic failure of fine needle aspiration cytology in breast cancer. J Oncol 2001; 76: 100-105.
9Bulgaresi P, Cariaggi MP, Bonardi L, Carozzi MF, Confortini M, Galanti L, Maddau C, Matucci M, Rubeca T, Turco P, Ciatto S, Miccinesi G. Analysis of morphologic patterns of fine needle aspiration of the breast to reduce false-negative results in breast cytology. Cancer 2005; 105:152-157.
10Aksaz E, Öncel T, Atasoy G, İrgil C, Yazıcı T, İpek N, Bitik D, Tolunay Ş. Core biyopsi açık biyopsilerin yerini alabilir mi? Meme Sağlığı Dergisi 2005;1: 18-20.
11Rocha P, Nadkarni NS, Menezes S. Fine needle aspiration biopsy of breast lesion and histopathologic correlation. Acta Cytologica 1997; 41: 705-711.