The impact of wound management on postoperative wound infection in perforated appendicitis
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
VOLUME: 21 ISSUE: 1
P: 33 - 36
January 2005

The impact of wound management on postoperative wound infection in perforated appendicitis

Turk J Surg 2005;21(1):33-36
1. Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 5. Genel Cerrahi Kliniği, ANKARA
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Purpose: Appendectomy is still most commonly performed emergency surgical procedure. Infection of the operative incision is the most common cause of morbidity after appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis. Background: Open wound management after complicated (gangrenous or perforated) acute appendicitis was common practice but, recently, primary closure has been advocated to reduce costs and morbidity. Medical records of 445 patients with a median age of 32 years (range 11-85) who had complicated appendicitis between 1997-2003 were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were subgrouped according to type of wound management. Patients in pimary closure and delayed closure subgroups were compared for age, gender, white blood cell count (WBC) on admission, American Society of Anesthesiologist class, APACHE II score, duration of operation, pathological diagnosis, length of hospital stay, the rate of wound infection and mortality. Results: Overall 64.9 % of the surgical wounds was closed primarily and 35.1 % was left open at the end of operation. There was no difference in terms of WBC count, duration of operation, length of hospital, and rate of wound infection between the groups. Conclusion: Based on the study results, we think that primary wound closure in perforated appendicitis is a safe and favourable wound management method.

Keywords:
Perforated appendicitis, wound management, primary closure, delayed closure

References

1
Hoffmann J, Rasmussen OO. Aids in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 1989; 76:774-9
2
LeMieur T, Rodriguez JL, Jacobs DM, Bennett MA, West MA. Wound management in perforated appendicitis. Am Surg 1999; 65:439-43.
3
Ohmann C, Franke C, Yang Q. Clinical benefit of a diagnostic score for appendicitis. Arch Surg 1999; 134:993-6.
4
Rappaport WD, Peterson M, Stanton C. Factors responsible for the high perforation rate seen in early childhood appendicitis. Am Surg 1989; 55:602-5.
5
Cruse PJE, Ford R. The epidemiology of wound infection. Surg Clin North Am 1980; 60:27-39.
6
Davey PG, Nathwani D. What is the value of preventing postoperative infections? New Horiz 1998; 6:64-71.
7
Schein M, Assalia A, Bachus H. Minimal antibiotic therapy after emergency abdominal surgery: a prospective study. Br J Surg 1994; 81:989-91.
8
Rucinski J, Fabian T, Panagopoulos G, Schein M, Wise L. Gangrenous and perforated appendicitis: a meta-analytic study of 2532 patients indicates that the incision should be closed primarily. Surgery 2000; 127:136-41.
9
Surana R, Puri P. Primary closure of contaminated wounds in perforated appendicitis in children. Br J Surg 1994; 81:440.
10
Waller VAP, Myers JG, Stewart RM, Dent DL, Page CP. Appendicitis: why so complicated? Analysis of 5755 cosequtive appendictomies. Am Surg 2000; 66:548-54.
11
Stone HH, Hester TR. Incisional and peritoneal infection after emergency celiotomy. Ann Surg 1973; 177:669-78.
12
Meissner K, Meissner G. Primary open wound management after emergency laparotomies for conditions associated with bacterial contamination: Reappraisal of a historical tradition. Am J Surg 1984; 148:613-7.
13
Grosfeld JL, Solit RW. Prevention of wound infection in perforated appendicitis. Ann Surg 1968; 168:891-5.
14
Andersen B, Bentsen A, Holbraad L. Wound infections after appendectomy. Acta Chir Scand 1972; 138:531-6.
15
Pettigraw RA. Delayed primary wound closure in gangrenous and perforated appendicitis. Br J Surg 1981; 68:635-8.
16
Tsang TM, Tam PK, Saing H. Delayed primary wound closure using skin tapes for advanced appendicitis in children. Arch Surg 1992; 127:451-3.
17
Yellin AE, Berne TV, Heseltine PN. Prospectice randomized study of two different doses of clindomycin admixd with gentamicin in the management of perforated appendicitis. Am Surg 1993; 4:248-55.
18
Cohn SM, Giannotti G, Ong AW, Varela JE, Shatz DV. Prospective randomized trial of two wound management strategies for dirty abdominal wounds. Ann Surg 2001; 233:409-13.
19
Raahave D, Friis-Moller A, Bjerre-Jepsen K. The infective dose of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in postoperative wound sepsis. Arch Surg 1986; 121:924-9.
20
Bohnen JM, Solomkin JS, Dellinger EP. Guidelines for clinical care: anti-infective agents for intra-abdominal infection. Arch Surg 1992; 127:83-9.
21
Nathens AB, Rotstein OD. Antimicrobial therapy for intra-abdominal infection. Am J Surg 1996; 172:1-6