Juvenile papillomatosis: A case report

Abstract

Juvenile papillomatosis (JP) is a very rare benign proliferative breast disease, especially in young women under 30 years of age. Its etiology is not clear yet. Although some patients have breast cancer in their family history, up to 10% breast cancer can develop in the follow-up of JP patients. In this pathology, which is diagnosed with biopsy, history, clinical and radiological findings help in diagnosis. In this case report, a 37-year-old patient diagnosed with JP will be discussed in the light of the literature.

Keywords: Juvenil papillomatosis, proliferative lesion, malignancy

Introduction

Juvenile papillomatosis (JP) is a rare benign mass-like lesion which is pre-dominantly seen in young women under 30 years old. It can confuse with fibroadenoma which is multinodular mass on breast examination, but JP lesions are generally are larger than fibroadenomas. Radiological and histopatological examinations play key role in certain diagnosis.

Case Presentation

A 37-year-old female patient with no known cancer history and additional disease in her family was referred to the radiology clinic after she applied to the general surgery outpatient clinic with a spontaneous discharge from the left. As a result of this mammography examination, asymmetric fibroglandular tissue density in the right midline posterior of the right breast was detected and ductal dilatations with secretion content were detected in bilateral retroareolar areas in both breasts that did not exceed one cm in both breasts (Figure 1A-1B, 2A-C). Since the nipple discharge of the patient could not be explained with defined mammographic and sonographic findings, a dynamic contrast-enhanced MR examination was performed in order to solving problem. In breast MRI examination; In the right breast at 12 o’clock, a lesion with a posterior location of 18 x 15 mm, which is hardly differentiated from the breast parenchyma, which contains millimetric cysts, was observed in the post-contrast series, with peripheral-weighted heterogeneous contrast, and in the late series, contrast loss was observed.In addition, in the subtraction images, non-mass heterogeneous segmental enhancements were recorded in an area of approximately 5 x 4.5 x 2.5 cm, including the neighborhood of the defined lesion, in the upper right outer quadrant of the right breast. The findings were evaluated in the category suspected for malignancy (Figure 3A-3B, 4A-4B). Corre biopsy was performed by correlating the lesion with the second aspect US, and the result of pathology was reported as ductal epithelial hyperplasia, sclerosing adenosis. The pathology result of the excisional biopsy performed for the lesion due to radiological-pathological incompatibility; It has been evaluated as “juvenile papillomatosis” containing atypical ductal hyperplasia areas (Figure 5A-C, 6A-C). The lesion causing the left nipple discharge of the patient was also detected by breast MRI and it was understood that it was a benign intraductal papilloma located at retroareolar location.

Figure 1. A,B. Asymmetric fibroglandular tissue density observed in the midline posterior on the right breast MLO view.

Figure 2. A,B. Doppler examination; cysts that do not show internal vascularization in heterogeneous parenchyma area at 12 o’clock in the right breast. C. The lesion is observed in medium stiffnes in elastography examination.

Figure 3. A. T2-weighted fat saturated axial MR image B. T2-weighted fat saturated sagittal MR image - Lesion with millimeter cysts approximately 2 cm from the nipple at 12 o’clock.

Figure 4. A. T1-weighted fat saturated axial MR image. B. T1-weighted post-contrast sagittal MR image - Peripheral enhancement at the lesion and adjacent non-mass segmental enhancements are observed.

Figure 5. A,B. Papilloma areas (HE x 40) characterized by papilla-like structures in the ductus lumens within the breast parenchyma (HE x 40). C. Atypical epithelial hyperplasia areas (HE x 40).

Figure 6. Sclerosing adenosis areas (HE x 40). B. Cystic enlarged ducts (HE x 40). C. Immunhistochemical calponin positivity around the ducts (HE x 40).

Discussion

JP is a pathology that was defined by Rosen et al. between 1947 and 1980 as a series of 37 cases. In the case series that was first described, the average age of the patients was 19 and mostly consist of Caucasian patients (1,2). Considering the general cases in the literature, it has been reported that 70% of the presented cases are under the age of 26, but this spectrum has expanded until the age of 40 (3,4). Although histopathological examinations may have different findings, the most common findings are accumulation with papillomatosis of ductus with or without JP epithelial atypia, papillary apocrine hyperplasia, sclerosing adenosis and stasis in ducts (5). In JP, which is also named in the literature as the Swiss cheese disease of the breast, the reason for this naming is that there are many cysts and ducts in the dense stromal areas in the microscopic images (6). JP may rarely be associated with severe atypia and focal epithelial necrosis. Patients with such histopathological characteristics generally display premalignant features and have been observed in elderly female patients (7). In the clinic, patients are usually presented with a well-circumscribed, rigid and mobile mass in the upper outer quadrant of the breast but not causing discharge from the nipple. Although the exact diagnosis of JP is made by biopsy, imaging modalities are used in the pre-operative diagnosis and follow-up of patients.In the ultrasound image, it is observed as hypoechoic mass, which is not generally well-circumscribed, and multiple small-sized weighted peripheral localized cysts (8). While the findings of the lesion are generally not observed in mammograms, rarely, asymmetric densities can be observed with pleomorphic and amorphous microcalcifications (8,9). Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted fat saturated images are useful in the evaluation of lesion contours and internal matrix. In T1-weighted images, a lobule contoured mass image is observed in the hypointense view; T2-weighted images, on the other hand, are the most helpful sequence in diagnosis since they show many small cysts (10). Since JP has active proliferative hyperplastic epithelial tissue, it shows involvement in contrast-enhanced MRI examinations. Contrast media involvement patterns are in the form of type 1 and type 2 curves, such as benign diseases (11,12). Despite its benign nature, there is an increased risk of breast cancer in JP cases. In 4-15% patients, JP and breast cancer co-exist at the time of diagnosis. Although JPs are generally associated with intraductal papillomas, they can also co-exist with invasive ductal, invasive lobular and secretory cancers of the breast (13). In addition, approximately 10% of patients with JP have a risk of developing breast cancer in their follow-up (13). Since incomplete surgical excision causes recurrences, extensive surgical excision and clinical follow-up are the most common treatment options in JP cases. In patients with bilateral, multifocal and recurrent family history, the frequency of follow-up should be increased since the risk of breast cancer increases (7-14).

Conclusion

JP is a benign proliferative lesion of the breast, which is frequently observed at a young age. Clinically, radiologically it can be confused with malignancy, requiring histopathological examination for a definitive. In terms of breast cancer that can accompany and occur during follow-up, extensive surgical excision, multiple sampling and clinical follow-up are recommended.

Cite this article as: Güneş YC, Öztekin PS, Değirmenci T, Uçar F, Uysal Ramadan S, Nercis Koşar P, et al. Juvenile papillomatosis: A case report. Turk J Surg 2024; 40 (2): 178-182.

Yes.

Externally peer-reviewed.

Concept - YCG, FU, TD, HÜ; Supervision - PSÖ, SUR, SE, PNK; Literature Search - All of authors; Writing Manuscript - All of authors; Critical Reviews - YCG, PSÖ.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

References

1. Rosen PP, Cantrell B, Mullen DL, DePalo A. Juvenile papillomatosis (swiss cheese disease) of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 1980; 4: 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-198004010-00001
2. Rosen PP, Holmes G, Lesser ML, Kinne DW, Beattie EJ Jr. Juvenile papillomatosis and breast carcinoma. Cancer 1985; 55: 1345-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19850315)55:63.0.CO;2-B
3. Kaneda HJ, Mack J, Kasales CJ. Pediatric and adolescent breast masses: A review of pathophysiology, imaging, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200: W204-W12. https://doi.org/10.2214/ AJR.12.9560
4. Kersschot EA, Hermans ME, Pauwels C, Gildemyn G, Chabeau P, de Vos L, et al. Juvenile papillomatosis of the breast: Sonographic appearance. Radiology 1988; 169 (3): 631-3. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.169.3.3055027
5. Lad S, Seely JM, Emaadawy M, Peddle S. Perkins G, Robertson SJ, Ibach K. et al. Juvenile papillomatosis: A case report and literature review. Clinical Breast Cancer 2014; 14(5): e103-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. clbc.2014.03.003
6. Öcal E, İpek DA, Yavaş A, Sak SD. Nadir görülen bir proliferatif meme hastalığı: Juvenil papillomatozis. 15-18 Kasım 2017 27. Ulusal Patoloji Kongresi Poster Sunumu, Antalya, Türkiye.
7. Rosen PP, Kimmel M. Juvenile papillomatosis of the breast. A follow-up study of 41 patients having biopsies before (1979). Am J Clin Pathol 1990; 93: (5); 599-603. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/93.5.599
8. Sabate JM, Clotet M, Torrubia S, Gomez A, Guerrero R, de Las Heras P, Lerma E. Radiologic evaluation of breast disorders related to pregnancy and lactation. Radiographics 2007; 27 (Suppl 1): S101-24. https:// doi.org/10.1148/rg.27si075505
9. Chung EM, Cube R, Hall GJ, González C, Stocher JT, Glassman LM. From the archives of the AFIP: Breast masses in children and adolescents: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 29 (3): 907- 31. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.293095010
10. Mussurakis S, Carleton PJ, Turnbull LW. Case report: MR imaging of juvenile papillomatosis of the breast. Br J Radiol 1996; 69 (825): 867-70. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-69-825-867
11. Durur Subaşı I, Alper F, Akçay MN, Demirci E, Gündoğdu C. Magnetic resonance imaging findings of breast juvenile papillomatosis. Jpn J Radiol 2013; 3 (6): 419-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-013-0197-5
12. Yılmaz R, Bayramoğlu Z, Biçen F, Kayhan A, Yeşil S, Acunas G. Sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of juvenile papillomatosis: Three cases with different manifestations. Ultrasound Q 2017; 33(2): 174-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000295
13. Álvarez M, Jiménez AV. Papilomatosis juvenil mamaria. Radiología 2001; 43(7): 361-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-8338(01)76995-0
14. Wang T, Li YQ, Liu H, Fu XL, Tang SC. Bifocal juvenile papillomatosis as a marker of breast cancer: A case report and review of the literature. Oncol Lett 2014; 8(6): 2587-90. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2600