Prognostic factors of stage III-B breast cancer after downstaging and modified radical mastectomy
Burak Kavlakoğlu, Seçkin Akküçük, Süleyman Oral
2008, Volume 24, Issue 1 Pages: 008-014
Similar Articles
Gail model for determination of the risk factors of breast cancer
Feza Y. Karakayali, Yahya Ekici, Şinasi Sevmiş, Sema Pehlivan, Zübeyde Arat, Gökhan Moray
2007, Volume 23, Issue 4 Pages: 129-135
Comparison of blue dye, lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probe, and combined technique for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer
Volkan Genç, Özlem Küçük, Atilla Halil Elhan, Serpil Dizbay Sak, Ragıp Çam
2007, Volume 23, Issue 4 Pages: 136-141
Interpectoral lymph node involvement in breast carcinoma
Sabahattin Aslan, Bahadır Çetin, Melih Akıncı, Akın Önder, Necmi Yücekule, Abdullah Çetin
2005, Volume 21, Issue 3 Pages: 120-126
Effect of breast preserving surgery in the treatment of early breast cancer (retrospective analysis)
Savaş Selçuk, Nihat Zalluhoğlu, Alp Gürkan, Serdar Kaçar, Selçuk Kılıç, Cezmi Karaca, Can Varılsüha
2005, Volume 21, Issue 3 Pages: 135-140
RELATIONSHIP OF ANGIOGENESIS AND AXILLARY LYMPH NODE METASTASIS IN BREAST CANCER
GÜNAY GÜRLEYİK, DİLEK KÜÇÜKERCAN, ÖZLEM AÇIKALIN, ÖNDER PEKER, ABDULLAH SAĞLAM
2002, Volume 18, Issue 1 Pages: 014-018
THE ACCURACY OF SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY IN INVASIVE BREAST CARCINOMA
ABUT KEBUDİ, ADNAN İŞGÖR, MURAT ATAY, GÜRKAN YETKİN, DEHAN YAZICI, AYGÜN YILDIZ
2002, Volume 18, Issue 1 Pages: 019-023
TRIPLE TEST IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST LUMPS: PHYSICAL EXAMINATION, MAMMOGRAPHY AND FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY
ANIL ÇUBUKÇU, OĞUZHAN BÜYÜKGEBİZ, NEŞET NURİ GÖNÜLLÜ ERCÜMENT ÇİFTÇİ, NADİR PAKSOY
2001, Volume 17, Issue 3 Pages: 169-173
EFFECT OF NASOGASTRIC TUBES ON THE MAXILLARY SINUS IN PATIENTS UNDERGONE ABDOMINAL SURGERY
MUSTAFA ALDEMİR, GÜLSEN YILMAZ, MURAT ACAR, MUHAMMED TEKİN, BİLSEL BAÇ
2001, Volume 17, Issue 4 Pages: 243-247
MINIMALLY INVASIVE AXILLARY INTERVENTION IN BREAST CANCER SURGERY: SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY
Fuat DEDE, Handan KAYA, Bahadır M GÜLLÜOĞLU ve Marmara Üniversitesi Meme Hastalıkları Grubu
2001, Volume 17, Issue 5 Pages: 273-282
THE EFFECTIVE USE OF POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSTIC FOLLOW-UP METHODS IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS
MİKDAT BOZER, EKREM ÜNAL, SERDAR YOL, HİLMİ KOCAOĞLU, SALİM DEMİRCİ, HİKMET AKGÜL, RAGIP ÇAM
2000, Volume 16, Issue 6 Pages: 359-364
THE EFFECTS OF MELATONIN ON ANGIOGENESIS AND WOUND HEALING
ÖZGÜR ODABAŞ, GÜRSEL SOYBİR, AYHAN BİLİR, HALUK KARDAŞ, CEMALETTİN TOPUZLU
2000, Volume 16, Issue 5 Pages: 291-298
SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY IN PATIENTS WITH INVASIVE BREAST CARCINOMA
GÜNAY GÜRLEYİK, EMİN GÜRLEYİK, DİLEK KÜÇÜKERCAN, SELÇUK ÜNALMIŞER
2000, Volume 16, Issue 4 Pages: 212-216
THE RELATION OF TUMORAL P53 IMMUNOREACTIVITY, CELL PROLIFERATION RATE AND MICROVESSEL DENSITY WITH THE PATHOLOGICAL STAGE IN ADVANCED STAGE GASTRIC CARCINOMA
MİNE G GÜLLÜOĞLU, NURCAN KILIÇLI ÇAMUR, SÜMER YAMANER, FERHUNDE DİZDAROĞLU
2000, Volume 16, Issue 4 Pages: 222-233
TO IDENTIFY THE QUALITY OF LIFE WITH SF-36 SCALE IN PATIENTS OPERATED FOR BREAST CANCER
ATİLLA SORAN, A FIRAT BULUT, OSMAN YILDIRIM, ÖMER CENGİZ
2000, Volume 16, Issue 2 Pages: 109-115
THE EFFECTIVE USING OF POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSTIC FOLLOW-UP METHODS IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS
MİKDAT BOZER, EKREM ÜNAL, SERDAR YOL, HİLMİ KOCAOĞLU, SALİM DEMİRCİ, HİKMET AKGÜL, RAGIP ÇAM
2000, Volume 16, Issue 2 Pages: 116-121
THE ANALYSIS OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH CONSERVATIVE THERAPY
EMİN YILDIRIM, KAPTAN GÜLBEN, UĞUR BERBEROĞLU, IŞIN PAK, BEKTAŞ KAYA
1999, Volume 15, Issue 5 Pages: 282-290
ANATOMIC VARIATIONS OF MEDIAL PECTORAL NERVE DETECTED DURING 50 MASTECTOMIES
CİHANGİR ÖZASLAN, NİYAZİ KARAMAN, SAİT ÇELEBİOĞLU, ALİ FİKRİ AYHAN, MEHMET ALTINOK
1997, Volume 13, Issue 3 Pages: 211-214
COMBINATION OF FLOW CYTOMETRIC DNA INDEX AND SYNTHESIS PHASE FRACTION HAVE AN INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC IMPORTANCE IN BREAST CANCER
NÜVİT DURAKER, BAYRAM KAYA, ÖZDEN ÖZ CALAY
1997, Volume 13, Issue 5 Pages: 355-360
Journal Metrics
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
| SCImago Journal Rank | 0.216 | 0.180 | 0.218 |
| CiteScore (Scopus) | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| CiteScore Rank (Scopus) | #279/422 | #291/469 | #312/495 |
| Journal Citation Indicator (Clarivate) | 234/271 (Q4) | 227/279 (Q4) | 230/286 (Q4) |
