Prognostic factors of stage III-B breast cancer after downstaging and modified radical mastectomy
Burak Kavlakoğlu, Seçkin Akküçük, Süleyman Oral
2008, Volume 24, Issue 1 Pages: 008-014
Similar Articles
Gail model for determination of the risk factors of breast cancer
Feza Y. Karakayali, Yahya Ekici, Şinasi Sevmiş, Sema Pehlivan, Zübeyde Arat, Gökhan Moray
2007, Volume 23, Issue 4 Pages: 129-135
Comparison of blue dye, lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probe, and combined technique for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer
Volkan Genç, Özlem Küçük, Atilla Halil Elhan, Serpil Dizbay Sak, Ragıp Çam
2007, Volume 23, Issue 4 Pages: 136-141
Interpectoral lymph node involvement in breast carcinoma
Sabahattin Aslan, Bahadır Çetin, Melih Akıncı, Akın Önder, Necmi Yücekule, Abdullah Çetin
2005, Volume 21, Issue 3 Pages: 120-126
Effect of breast preserving surgery in the treatment of early breast cancer (retrospective analysis)
Savaş Selçuk, Nihat Zalluhoğlu, Alp Gürkan, Serdar Kaçar, Selçuk Kılıç, Cezmi Karaca, Can Varılsüha
2005, Volume 21, Issue 3 Pages: 135-140
Delayed locoregional recurrences after mastectomy: A case report
Oktay Banlı, Hasan Altun, Burak Kavlakoğlu
2005, Volume 21, Issue 4 Pages: 204-205
THE ACCURACY OF SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY IN INVASIVE BREAST CARCINOMA
ABUT KEBUDİ, ADNAN İŞGÖR, MURAT ATAY, GÜRKAN YETKİN, DEHAN YAZICI, AYGÜN YILDIZ
2002, Volume 18, Issue 1 Pages: 019-023
CORRELATION OF PROLIFERATIVE ACTIVITY AND MICROVESSEL DENSITY OF THE TUMOUR WITH STANDARD PROGNOSTIC MARKERS IN INVASIVE BREAST CARCINOMA
GÜNAY GÜRLEYİK, DİLEK KÜÇÜKERCAN, GÜLDEREN DEMİREL, EMİN GÜRLEYİK, ÖNDER PEKER, ABDULLAH SAĞLAM
2002, Volume 18, Issue 2 Pages: 091-096
TRIPLE TEST IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST LUMPS: PHYSICAL EXAMINATION, MAMMOGRAPHY AND FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY
ANIL ÇUBUKÇU, OĞUZHAN BÜYÜKGEBİZ, NEŞET NURİ GÖNÜLLÜ ERCÜMENT ÇİFTÇİ, NADİR PAKSOY
2001, Volume 17, Issue 3 Pages: 169-173
MINIMALLY INVASIVE AXILLARY INTERVENTION IN BREAST CANCER SURGERY: SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY
Fuat DEDE, Handan KAYA, Bahadır M GÜLLÜOĞLU ve Marmara Üniversitesi Meme Hastalıkları Grubu
2001, Volume 17, Issue 5 Pages: 273-282
THE EFFECTIVE USE OF POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSTIC FOLLOW-UP METHODS IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS
MİKDAT BOZER, EKREM ÜNAL, SERDAR YOL, HİLMİ KOCAOĞLU, SALİM DEMİRCİ, HİKMET AKGÜL, RAGIP ÇAM
2000, Volume 16, Issue 6 Pages: 359-364
TO IDENTIFY THE QUALITY OF LIFE WITH SF-36 SCALE IN PATIENTS OPERATED FOR BREAST CANCER
ATİLLA SORAN, A FIRAT BULUT, OSMAN YILDIRIM, ÖMER CENGİZ
2000, Volume 16, Issue 2 Pages: 109-115
THE EFFECTIVE USING OF POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSTIC FOLLOW-UP METHODS IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS
MİKDAT BOZER, EKREM ÜNAL, SERDAR YOL, HİLMİ KOCAOĞLU, SALİM DEMİRCİ, HİKMET AKGÜL, RAGIP ÇAM
2000, Volume 16, Issue 2 Pages: 116-121
THE ANALYSIS OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS TREATED WITH CONSERVATIVE THERAPY
EMİN YILDIRIM, KAPTAN GÜLBEN, UĞUR BERBEROĞLU, IŞIN PAK, BEKTAŞ KAYA
1999, Volume 15, Issue 5 Pages: 282-290
ANATOMIC VARIATIONS OF MEDIAL PECTORAL NERVE DETECTED DURING 50 MASTECTOMIES
CİHANGİR ÖZASLAN, NİYAZİ KARAMAN, SAİT ÇELEBİOĞLU, ALİ FİKRİ AYHAN, MEHMET ALTINOK
1997, Volume 13, Issue 3 Pages: 211-214
CAUSATIVE FACTORS IN POSTMASTECTOMIC LYMPHOEDEMA
MURAT KAPKAÇ, MEHMET PEKDEMİR, EMİN ÖZDEDELİ, MAHİR AKYILDIZ, M RASİH YILMAZ, ORHAN ÖZBAL
1996, Volume 12, Issue 2 Pages: 123-127
RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF OUR BREAST CANCER CASES (DURING 10 YEARS PERIOD)
M NURAN AKÇAY, M İLHAN YILDIRGAN, M YAVUZ ÇAPAN, FEHMİ ÇELEBİ, CAFER POLAT, DURKAYA ÖREN
1996, Volume 12, Issue 3 Pages: 225-230
PRIMARY CHEMOTHERAPY IN BREAST CANCER
PINAR SAİP, ERKAN TOPUZ
1995, Volume 11, Issue 5 Pages: 340-348
THE SENTINEL LYMPH NODE CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY DETECTED BY THE USAGE OF LYMPHOSCINTIGRAPHY AND GAMMA-PROBE IN CASES OF BREAST CANCER
Dr. Oktar ASOĞLU, Dr. Mahmut MÜSLÜMANOĞLU, Dr. Abdullah İĞCİ, Dr. Vahit ÖZMEN, Dr. Mustafa KEÇER, Dr. Mesut PARLAK, Dr. Yavuz BOZFAKİOĞLU, Dr. Ece DİLEĞE, Dr. Ayşe MUDUN, Dr. Ekrem YAVUZ
2003, Volume 19, Issue 4 Pages: 199-207
Journal Metrics
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
| SCImago Journal Rank | 0.216 | 0.180 | 0.218 |
| CiteScore (Scopus) | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| CiteScore Rank (Scopus) | #279/422 | #291/469 | #312/495 |
| Journal Citation Indicator (Clarivate) | 234/271 (Q4) | 227/279 (Q4) | 230/286 (Q4) |
