Ajith Atul1, Thirthar Palanivelu Elamurugan1, Sundaramurthi Sudharsanan1, Chellappa Vijayakumar1, Gubbi Shamanna Sreenath1, Vairappan Balasubramaniyan2

1Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduation Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India
2Department of Biochemistry, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduation Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India

Abstract

Objective: Gastric carcinoma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early detection can help reduce mortality rates. Biomarkers are being investigated globally for their potential in disease screening, monitoring, and follow-up in various cancers. However, currently, there is insufficient data on the role of biomarkers in gastric carcinoma.

Material and Methods: This single center case control study was conducted from June 2018 to March 2021 from South India. Blood samples were collected from 85 patients diagnosed with gastric carcinoma and 85 apparently healthy individuals serving as the control group. The samples were collected in a fasting state. The serum levels of biomarkers interferon gamma (IFNγ), interleukin 10 (IL-10), and matrix metalloproteinase 7 (MMP7) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and compared between the two groups. Additionally, the levels of biomarkers were compared within the gastric cancer group based on disease location, stage, and histotype.

Results: The serum levels of IFNγ and IL-10 were found to be significantly elevated in gastric carcinoma patients compared to the healthy control group. Both biomarkers exhibited high sensitivity and specificity in detecting carcinoma of the stomach. However, there was no significant difference in the serum level of MMP7 between gastric cancer patients and control group.

Conclusion: IFNγ and IL-10 show promise as potential molecular biomarkers for the detection of gastric carcinoma. Further, well designed studies, involving larger and more diverse populations matched for stage and histological types, are necessary to establish the screening and monitoring utility of these biomarkers in gastric carcinoma.

Keywords: Matrix metalloproteinase 7, interferon gamma, interleukin 10, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, gastric cancer, screening

Introduction

According to Global Cancer Statistics (GLOBACON) 2020, gastric cancer ranks as the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth leading cause of cancerrelated mortality. The current annual burden of gastric cancer amounts to approximately 1.1 million new cases per year and is expected to rise to 1.8 million per year by 2040 (1). However, the diagnosis of early-stage gastric carcinoma remains below 20% of cases, which results in poor prognosis and overall survival (2). To reduce disease burden, early detection and efficient monitoring of gastric carcinoma are crucial, necessitating the identification of novel screening, monitoring, and prognostic tools such as biomarkers.

The tumor microenvironment encompasses a variety of cells and inflammatory mediators, each exhibiting unique patterns in different tumors. These mediators can be detected and measured in peripheral plasma, offering potential for tumor detection and monitoring. Inflammatory molecules play a significant role in immune responses, chronic inflammation, tissue injury, and the development of cancer, invasion, and metastasis. The balance between pro-inflammatory and antiinflammatory chemical mediators influence tumor growth (3).

Interferon gamma (IFNγ) is an important inflammatory mediator within the cancer microenvironment, released by invading immune cells. The role of IFNγ in gastric carcinogenesis remains controversial as it has been associated with both procarcinogenic and anti-carcinogenic properties (4). Interleukin 10 (IL-10) is an antiinflammatory molecule produced by tumor infiltrating B lymphocytes, Th2 cells, macrophages, and tumor cells. Like IFNγ, IL-10 has been found to exhibit both tumorsupportive and tumor-inhibitory roles within the cancer microenvironment (5).

Some recent studies, including one conducted by Shokrzadeh et. al., suggest that there may be an increase in serum levels of IL-10 and IFNγ, potentially indicating their usefulness as diagnostic markers for early detection of gastric carcinoma (6). Matrix metalloproteinase 7 (MMP7) is an enzyme known for its involvement in tumorigenesis, metastasis, and inflammatory processes through the remodeling of extracellular matrix components.

Limited studies have been conducted in the Indian subcontinent involving the serum levels of IFNγ, IL-10, and MMP7 in gastric carcinoma patients (7-11). The significance of these biomarkers in gastric carcinoma is yet to be confirmed with larger and more diverse populations. In this study, we assessed the circulating levels in blood of three important biomolecules IFNγ, IL-10, and MMP7 in gastric carcinoma patients and compared them with their levels in an apparently healthy control population.

Material and Methods

The project received approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee in 2018, and the study was conducted from June 2018 to March 2021 in a tertiary care centre from South India.

Study Population and Sampling

The sample size was calculated using OPENEPI software for unmatched case-control studies with proportions, considering a 10% dropout rate, 80% power, and 95% confidence interval. Fasting blood samples were collected from 85 patients diagnosed with gastric carcinoma before treatment and 85 volunteers as controls. All participants were aged 18 years or older and provided informed consent to participate in the study. Venous blood samples of 5 mL were collected, centrifuged, and stored at -80°C until analysis.

Biomarker Analysis

The samples were processed using commercially available enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits to assess the levels of the selected biomarkers, following the methodology provided in the respective user manuals. IL-10 levels were assessed using the Diaclone IL-10 ELISA kit. IFNγ levels were assessed using the fine test human IFNγ ELISA kit. MMP7 levels were assessed using the human matrix metalloproteinase-7 ELISA kit from Bioassay Technology Laboratories.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS software version 20.0 for Windows. A few extreme outlier values were excluded from the study as they were due to ELISA well defects. Demographic data was compared and analysed using unpaired t-test for age and Chi-square test for gender. The serum levels of biomarkers were expressed in their respective quantitative units and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The variation of biomarkers based on the stage of the disease, location, and histology was calculated, and analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

A total of 170 participants were included (85 in each group) in the study. On comparing the mean age between the groups, it was found that there was a significant difference between age; however, the difference in proportion of sex between the groups was not significant. Half of the study patients presented with abdominal pain (Table 1). The statistical difference between the median values of IFNγ and IL-10 (not MMP7 levels) in these two groups were found to be significant (p< 0.001) (Table 2). Statistical significance of individual biomarker level difference between the stages of gastric carcinoma was found to be statistically insignificant (Table 3).



It also showed the variation in serum levels of biomarkers according to the histology of gastric cancer. Statistical significance was not established when the biomarker values were compared between diffuse and intestinal types of adenocarcinoma. Other variants like GIST and lymphoma were not compared as their frequency in the data was too less to compare.

ROC Curve for Interleukin 10

A point of maximum sensitivity 86% (85.9%) and specificity 88% (88.2%) was selected as the cut-off point for IL-10 level, which corresponds to the serum level of 7.73 pg/mL and the area under curve was 0.9. This implied that IL-10 level at 7.73 pg/mL can classify the population into gastric carcinoma patients and healthy population with high accuracy (Figure 1).

ROC Plot for Interferon Gamma

A point of 95% (95.3%) sensitivity and 81% (81.2%) specificity was selected, which corresponds to serum level of 8.7 pg/mL as the cut off value and the area under curve was 0.9. This implied that IL-10 level at 8.7 pg/mL can classify population into gastric carcinoma patients and healthy population with high accuracy (Figure 2).

Discussion

Despite numerous research efforts and advancements, latestage diagnosis remains a hindrance to the prognosis of gastric carcinoma in most cases. In developed countries like Japan and Korea, pre-emptive screening using upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has proven to enhance survival rates through early detection. However, the feasibility of implementing such screening programs on a day-to-day basis in developing countries is questionable. Ongoing studies aim to discover affordable and economical screening, diagnostic, monitoring, and prognostic tools for gastric carcinoma. Biomarkers play a crucial role in tumor management, overcoming the limitations of invasive, technically demanding, and expensive monitoring tools currently in use. Various biomarkers are being studied worldwide for their potential application in gastric carcinoma.

In our study, the average age of gastric carcinoma patients was found to be 54 years, which aligns with similar studies conducted in South India (average age of 60 years) and Eastern India (average age of 55 years) (8,9). The male-to-female ratio among gastric carcinoma patients in our study was 1.83:1. Comparable male predominance ratios have been observed in the northeastern population of India (2.16:1) and in other Indian studies (2:1) (10,11). A recent study reported a male predominance ratio of 2.2:1 worldwide for gastric carcinoma (12). Similar trends were observed in Korean patients younger than 45 years (13). This difference in sex difference may be attributed to the protective effects of female hormones as well as higher exposure to environmental agents like tobacco and alcohol in males (14,15).

Abdominal pain was the most common symptom reported by 56% of the gastric carcinoma patients in our study, followed by vomiting (41%), weight loss (10%), abdominal distension (15%), bleeding manifestations (6%), and regurgitation (3.5%). Similar studies have reported abdominal discomfort, pain, and anorexia as the most common presenting symptoms in gastric carcinoma patients (8,11).

Regarding tumor location, 15% of the patients in our study had proximal gastric cancer (fundus and cardia growths), 14% had cancer of the body of the stomach, and 71% had distal stomach carcinoma (antrum and pylorus growths). Other Indian studies have also shown that distal stomach is the most common location for gastric carcinoma (9,10). However, a Chinese analysis has reported a higher prevalence of gastric cardia tumors in their study population (16).

At presentation, 74% of the patients in our study had locally advanced gastric carcinoma, 20% had metastasis, and only 6% presented in the early stage. Similar findings have been reported by other studies, suggesting that late-stage presentation of gastric carcinoma is a common occurrence due to symptoms developing as the disease progresses and limited access to advanced healthcare and diagnostic tools in developing countries (10,16-18). Adenocarcinoma accounted for 92% of the gastric carcinoma cases in our study, with 41% classified as diffuse type and 59% as intestinal type. Other studies have also observed a higher frequency of intestinal type adenocarcinoma in gastric cancer patients (19,20). However, contrasting results have been reported in different populations, indicating that the prevalence of adenocarcinoma types may vary in different regions (21).

Helicobacter pylori and T cell inflammatory reactions can increase IFNγ in the gastric mucosa, leading to high serum IFNγ levels in gastric cancer patients (7,22,23). In our study, a significant rise in serum levels of IFNγ was observed in gastric carcinoma cases compared to controls. It is not clear if this increase is related to EBV or H. Pylori infections (24,25). However, conflicting results have been reported by other studies, with some showing decreased levels of IFNγ in gastric cancer patients compared to healthy controls (26). Nonetheless, our study found a high sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 81% for IFNγ at a level of 8.7 pg/mL in differentiating gastric carcinoma patients from controls. Similarly, our study revealed higher serum levels of IL-10 in gastric carcinoma patients compared to controls. Similar trends have been reported by other studies emerging from India and other countries with average IL-10 levels ranging from 16-27 pg/mL in gastric carcinoma patients (6,23,27,28). A high sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 88% at a level of 8.7 pg/mL were observed for IL-10 in our study. The high sensitivity and specificity observed for IL-10 (86% sensitivity; 88% specificity) and IFNγ (95% sensitivity; 81% specificity) support their utility in differentiating gastric carcinoma patients. This is in line with the proposed utility of IFNγ and IL-10 by Sánchez-Zauco et al. (22). Comparison of IL-10 and IFNγ values among different tumor locations, histological types, and stages of gastric carcinoma in our study did not yield statistically significant differences. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to conclusively determine the significance of these biomarkers according to these variables.

MMP7 levels were analyzed in our study, but no significant relationship could be established between gastric carcinoma patients and controls. Contrasting results have been reported in other studies, with high MMP7 levels associated with poor prognosis in gastric carcinoma patients in some analyses (29-31). On the other hand, one study even observed immunonegative staining for MMP7 in majority of gastric cancer patients (32). Genetic polymorphism of the MMP7 gene and genotypic influences on its expression may contribute to the variability in results.

Conclusion

The introduction of novel biomarkers and the exploration of the tumor microenvironment have opened up a wide scope for early diagnosis and treatment approaches for numerous diseases, including gastric carcinoma. Our study has revealed higher serum levels of IFNγ and IL-10 in gastric carcinoma, suggesting the potential utility of these biomarkers for screening and monitoring gastric carcinoma patients. Further studies involving larger and more heterogeneous populations can help establish the effectiveness of these biomarkers in the management of gastric carcinoma.

Cite this article as: Atul A, Elamurugan TP, Sudharsanan S, Vijayakumar C, Sreenath GS, Balasubramaniyan V. Unveiling molecular clues: Exploring IFNγ, IL-10, and MMP7 blood levels in gastric carcinoma patients. Turk J Surg 2024; 40 (3): 212-218.

Ethics Committee Approval

The study was approved by the Jawaharlal Instıtute of Postgraduate Medical Education Research Institutional Ethics Committee (Human Studies) (Decision no: JIP/IEC/2018/0215 Date: 23.05.2018).

Peer Review

Externally peer-reviewed.

Author Contributions

Concept - SGS; Design - AA, SGS; Materials - AA, CV, SS; Data Collection and/or Processing - AA; Analysis and/or Interpretation - TPE, BV; Literature Search - AA, CV, SS; Writing Manuscript - AA; Critical Reviews - SGS, BV, TPE.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Financial Disclosure

This study was supported by Intramural Research Grant received from Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER).

References

  1. Zhang X, Li M, Chen S, Hu J, Guo Q, Liu R, et al. Endoscopic screening in Asian countries is associated with reduced gastric cancer mortality: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastroenterology 2018; 155: 347-54.e9. https://doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.04.026.
  2. Morgan E, Arnold M, Camargo MC, Gini A, Kunzmann AT, Matsuda T, et al. The current and future incidence and mortality of gastric cancer in 185 countries, 2020-40: A population-based modelling study. E Clinical Medicine 2022; 47: 101404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101404
  3. Căinap C, Nagy V, Gherman A, Cetean S, Laszlo I, Constantin AM, et al. Classic tumor markers in gastric cancer. Current standards and limitations. Clujul Med 2015; 88(2): 111-5. https://doi.org/10.15386/ cjmed-409
  4. Kumar S, Kumari N, Mittal RD, Mohindra S, Ghoshal UC. Association between pro-(IL-8) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokine variants and their serum levels and H. pylori-related gastric carcinogenesis in northern India. Meta Gene 2015; 6: 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. mgene.2015.07.008
  5. Ni L, Lu J. Interferon gamma in cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Med 2018; 7: 4509-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1700
  6. Shokrzadeh M, Mohammadpour A, Hoseini V, Abediankenari S, Ghassemi-Barghi N, Tabari YS. Serum cytokine of il-2, il-10 and il-12 levels in patients with stomach adenocarcinoma. Arq Gastroenterol 2018; 55: 385-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-2803.201800000-83
  7. Sánchez-Zauco N, Torres J, Gómez A, Camorlinga-Ponce M, MuñozPérez L, Herrera-Goepfert R, et al. Circulating blood levels of IL-6, IFN-γ, and IL-10 as potential diagnostic biomarkers in gastric cancer: A controlled study. BMC Cancer 2017; 17: 384. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12885-017-3310-9
  8. Matsuoka T, Yashiro M. Biomarkers of gastric cancer: Current topics and future perspective. World J Gastroenterol. 2018; 24(26): 2818-32. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i26.2818.
  9. Saha AK, Maitra S, Hazra SC. Epidemiology of gastric cancer in the gangetic areas of west bengal. ISRN Gastroenterol 2013; 2013: 823483. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/823483
  10. Barad AK, Mandal SK, Harsha HS, Sharma BM, Singh TS. Gastric cancer-a clinicopathological study in a tertiary care centre of Northeastern India. J Gastrointest Oncol 2014; 5: 142-7.
  11. Chand A, Malhotra P, Barall D, Singh S, Thapa G. Clinico-pathological presentation of gastric carcinoma and its relation to the anatomical site of occurrence among patients in the hilly state of Himachal Pradesh, India. Int Surg J 2019; 6: 2119-25. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349- 2902.isj20192378
  12. Rawla P, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of gastric cancer: Global trends, risk factors and prevention. Prz Gastroenterol 2019; 14: 26-38. https://doi. org/10.5114/pg.2018.80001
  13. Chung HW, Noh SH, Lim JB. Analysis of demographic characteristics in 3242 young age gastric cancer patients in Korea. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 256-63. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i2.256
  14. Kim SM, Min BH, Lee J, An JY, Lee JH, Sohn TS, et al. Protective effects of female reproductive factors on lauren intestinaltype gastric adenocarcinoma. Yonsei Med J 2018; 59: 28-34. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2018.59.1.28
  15. Chandanos E, Lagergren J. Oestrogen and the enigmatic male predominance of gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 2008; 44: 2397-403. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.07.031
  16. Sharma A, Radhakrishnan V. Gastric cancer in India. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2011; 32(1): 12-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971- 5851.81884
  17. Gong Y, Wang P, Zhu Z, Zhang J, Huang J, Xu H. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of upper gastric cancer patients in China: A 32-Year single-center retrospective clinical study. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2019; 2019: 9248394. https://doi. org/10.1155/2019/9248394
  18. Elmajjaoui S, Ismaili N, Zaidi H, Elkacemi H, Hassouni K, Kebdani T, et al. Epidemiological, clinical, pathological, and therapeutic aspects of gastric cancer in Morocco. Clin Cancer Inv J 2014; 3: 3. https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-0513.125770
  19. Qiu MZ, Cai MY, Zhang DS, Wang ZQ, Wang DS, Li YH, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic analysis of Lauren classification in gastric adenocarcinoma in China. J Transl Med 2013; 11: 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5876-11-58
  20. Safaee A, Moghimi-Dehkordi B, Fatemi SR, Ghiasi S, Pourhoseingholi MA, Zali MR. Clinicopathological features of gastric cancer: A study based on cancer registry data. Iranian J Cancer Prev 2009; 2: 67- 70.
  21. Rana N, Gosain R, Lemini R, Wang C, Gabriel E, Mohammed T, et al. Socio-demographic disparities in gastric adenocarcinoma: A population-based study. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12: 157. https://doi. org/10.3390/cancers12010157
  22. Sánchez-Zauco N, Torres J, Gómez A, Camorlinga-Ponce M, MuñozPérez L, Herrera-Goepfert R, et al. Circulating blood levels of IL-6, IFN-γ, and IL-10 as potential diagnostic biomarkers in gastric cancer: A controlled study. BMC Cancer 2017; 17: 384. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12885-017-3310-9
  23. Epplein M, Xiang YB, Cai Q, Peek RM Jr, Li H, Correa P, et al. Circulating cytokines and gastric cancer risk. Cancer Causes Control 2013; 24: 2245-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-013-0284-z
  24. Cárdenas-Mondragón MG, Torres J, Sánchez-Zauco N, GómezDelgado A, Camorlinga-Ponce M, Maldonado-Bernal C, et al. Elevated levels of interferon-γ are associated with high levels of Epstein-barr virus reactivation in patients with the intestinal type of gastric cancer. J Immunol Res 2017; 2017: 7069242. https://doi. org/10.1155/2017/7069242
  25. Abdollahi H, Shams S, Zahedi MJ, Darvish Moghadam S, Hayatbakhsh MM, Jafarzadeh A. IL-10, TNF-α and IFN-γ levels in serum and stomach mucosa of helicobacter pylori-infected patients. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2011; 10: 267-71.
  26. Zhao H, Dong N, Liu T, Zhang P, Zheng Y, Yang L, et al. Clinical significance of serum type III interferons in patients with gastric cancer. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2019; 39: 155-63. https://doi.org/10.1089/jir.2018.0119
  27. Szaflarska A, Szczepanik A, Siedlar M, Czupryna A, Sierzega M, Popiela T, et al. Preoperative plasma level of IL-10 but not of proinflammatory cytokines is an independent prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. Antican Res 2009; 29: 5005-12.
  28. Chen L, Shi Y, Zhu X, Guo W, Zhang M, Che Y, et al. IL 10 secreted by cancer associated macrophages regulates proliferation and invasion in gastric cancer cells via c Met/STAT3 signaling. Oncol Rep 2019; 42(2): 595-604. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2019.7206
  29. Soleyman-Jahi S, Nedjat S, Abdirad A, Hoorshad N, Heidari R, Zendehdel K. Prognostic significance of matrix metalloproteinase-7 in gastric cancer survival: A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0122316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122316
  30. India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Cancer Collaborators. The burden of cancers and their variations across the states of India: The Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2016. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19: 1289-306.
  31. Yeh YC, Sheu BS, Cheng HC, Wang YL, Yang HB, Wu JJ. Elevated serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 and -7 in H. pylori-related gastric cancer can be biomarkers correlating with a poor survival. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55(6): 1649-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-009-0926-x
  32. Koskensalo S, Mrena J, Wiksten JP, Nordling S, Kokkola A, Hagström J, et al. MMP-7 overexpression is an independent prognostic marker in gastric cancer. Tumour Biol 2010; 31: 149-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s13277-010-0020-1