Retrohepatic inferior vena cava reconstruction with saphenous vein patch in advanced stage cholangiocarcinoma
Abuzer Dirican1, Mustafa Özsoy2, Bora Barut1, Volkan İnce1, Mustafa Ateş1, Sezai Yılmaz1
1Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, İnönü University Faculty of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey
2Department of General Surgery, Afyon Kocatepe University Faculty of Medicine, Afyon, Turkey
Abstract
Hepatic resection is the only known curative treatment option in primary and metastatic liver tumors. Unlike other types of malignancies, the response rate to even the best chemotherapy protocols is quite low in liver malignancies. Survival is expressed in months in untreated liver malignancies or in patients with residual tumor after resection. The optimal survival can be achieved only by liver resection with negative surgical margins. In order to increase the number of patients suitable for hepatic resection, techniques such as portal vein embolization, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, two-step hepatectomy, re-do hepatectomy, hypothermic liver perfusion have been developed and newer modalities are still being investigated. Primary liver malignancies like hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic liver tumors can invade the retrohepatic vena cava due to anatomical proximity. Invasion of either the hepatocaval confluence or vena cava are often considered as contraindications for liver resection due to the risk of intraoperative massive air embolism or hemorrhage. In this article, we present a patient who underwent left hepatectomy together with vena cava resection and reconstruction with saphenous vein patch due to cholangiocarcinoma.
Keywords: Cholangiocarcinoma, inferior vena cava resection, liver, resection
Written informed consent was obtained from patient who participated in this case.
Externally peer-reviewed.
Concept -S.Y.; Design - A.D.; Supervision - M.A.; Funding - V.İ.; Materials - V.İ.; Data Collection and/or Processing - B.B.; Analysis and/or Interpretation - B.B.; Literature Review - M.Ö.; Writer - M.Ö.; Critical Review - A.D.
No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.