PATIENT'S RIGHT TO SELF-DETERM1NATION: INFORMED CONSENT
MURAT CİVANER, CEM TERZİ
2001, Volume 17, Issue 2 Pages: 082-091
Similar Articles
EVALUATION OF GENERAL SURGICAL LITIGATIONS DISCUSSED IN HEALTH COUNCIL BETWEEN 1995-2000
Dr. Ali Rıza TÜMER
2003, Volume 19, Issue 1 Pages: 011-016
How informed are endocrine surgery patients about the risks of surgery after approving an informed consent?
Yiğit Türk, Özer Makay, Gökhan İçöz, Mahir Akyıldız
The retrospective documentation of legal cases with bile duct injury that were submitted for consideration to İstanbul Forensic Medicine Institute by the courts between 2008-2012
M. Arif Karakaya, Okay Koç, Feza Ekiz, A. Feran Ağaçhan
Evaluation of the readability of informed consent forms used in urology: Is there a difference between open, endoscopic, and laparoscopic surgery?
Mehmet Giray Sönmez, Betül Kozanhan, Mehmet Serkan Özkent, Gökhan Ecer, Mehmet Salih Boğa, Erhan Demirelli, Ahmet Öztürk
Importance of informed consent defined by General Surgery Associations in Turkey
Erdinç Kamer , Ali Rıza Tümer , Turan Acar , Burak Uyar , Gülden Ballı , Fevzi Cengiz , Mesut Özoğul , Mehmet Hacıyanlı
Journal Metrics
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
| SCImago Journal Rank | 0.216 | 0.180 | 0.218 |
| CiteScore (Scopus) | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| CiteScore Rank (Scopus) | #279/422 | #291/469 | #312/495 |
| Journal Citation Indicator (Clarivate) | 234/271 (Q4) | 227/279 (Q4) | 230/286 (Q4) |
