The effect of different surgical methods on complications and on the quality of life in pilonidal sinus disease
Kasım Çağlayan, Bülent Güngör, Hamza Çınar, Koray Topgül, Tuğrul Kesicioğlu, Cafer Polat, Nilden Arslan
Similar Articles
Comparison of surgical Limberg flap technique and crystallized phenol application in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective study
Kaan Akan, Deniz Tihan, Uğur Duman, Yiğit Özgün, Fatih Erol, Murat Polat
A new surgical approach for pilonidal sinus disease: "de-epithelialization technique"
Özgür Dandin, Deniz Tihan, Dursun Özgür Karakaş, Batuhan Hazer, Ahmet Ziya Balta, Oğuz Uğur Aydın
Comparison of limberg flap and oval flap techniques in sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease surgery
Banu Karapolat , Sercan Büyükakıncak , Eray Kurnaz , Üzer Küçüktülü
Comparison of postoperative quality of life of Limberg flap and Karydakis flap in pilonidal sinus operations
Sabahattin Destek, Hüseyin Kazım Bektaşoğlu, Enver Kunduz, Merve Nil Akyüz
Turkey is leading in the 21st century pilonidal sinus disease research
Dietrich Doll, Verena Stauffer, Maja Diekann, Pieter Van Wyk, Markus M Luedi
Fasciocutaneous Elliptical Rotation Flap for Pilonidal Sinus Disease and Its Outcomes
Emre Gündoğdu(0000-0002-2756-1372
Management of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease in children: A survey study in Turkey
Anar Gurbanov, Ergun Ergün, Gülnur Göllü, Ufuk Ateş
Journal Metrics
| 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
| SCImago Journal Rank | 0.216 | 0.180 | 0.218 |
| CiteScore (Scopus) | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| CiteScore Rank (Scopus) | #279/422 | #291/469 | #312/495 |
| Journal Citation Indicator (Clarivate) | 234/271 (Q4) | 227/279 (Q4) | 230/286 (Q4) |
